Home CMMG Armament L.A.R.B. Mod 3 AR-15 Buffer for the VLTOR A5 Buffer System

Armament L.A.R.B. Mod 3 AR-15 Buffer for the VLTOR A5 Buffer System

637
9

Shop review and field test. If you like what you see please consider supporting my channel by making a small pledge on my Patreon page at

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

9 COMMENTS

  1. It seems to me having the weight forward would reduce the cyclic rate more because it would keep it in battery longer. (More weight to start moving) That also gives you more time to allow pressure to drop before extraction. Maybe I am misunderstanding some physics involved here but the second I saw the way that weight & spring were installed I thought "that's backwards"
    Anyways, I sure love the A5 system. We first tried it because my partner has severe arthritis and I was looking to build her a rifle with as little felt recoil as possible. It helped the felt recoil some but it smoothed out the entire action & got rid of all the pesky little issues carbines tend to have. We got a carbine that feels and functions like a full length rifle with a full length buffer system. lol Within a month I ordered 2 more for my carbines and with KEK selling individual buffer weights/parts it's easy to change buffer weights to tune individual guns.
    I have found simply switching to the A5 buffer system with a full length chrome silicon spring increases reliability, smooths out the action and it's far less picky as far as using different powders/ammo goes.
    I think when they designed the carbine tube/buffer/spring, they pushed it to the limit. It works fine when the spring is new and you have the right weight in there for your ammo etc but there isn't much room for variation. Spring gets a little old, you switch ammo and your reliable little carbine isn't so reliable anymore. I think that A5 steps back from that limit a bit and gives you more room for variation in ammo and less than ideal conditions.
    lol No, I don't work for Vltor. I know buffers & tubes aren't slick, exciting upgrades but they are a solid functional upgrade for very reasonable cost. I used a PSA AR10 tube for $20. I noticed it's the same length as the A5 so I got a weight from Vltor, the PSA tube and a CS rifle spring for under $80.

  2. Nick Barry at Armament said it is fine to run the internal spring and weight either way. I found a much slower bolt velocity with the weight forward and spring in the rear. That translates into softer felt recoil, more control and less wear and tear on your rifle. Make sure you keep the little internal pad forward if you do this.

Leave a Reply