Home AR-15 This Is The Dumbest AR-15 Claim I’ve Heard Yet

This Is The Dumbest AR-15 Claim I’ve Heard Yet

4
25

Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker went on the news and claimed the AR-15 can fire **60 bullets per second**.

Not per minute.

Per second.

That gun does not exist.

A real fully automatic M4 runs roughly 12 to 16 rounds per second.

An AK-47 on full auto is around 10.

Even a Glock with an illegal switch is nowhere near 60 rounds per second — and those are already nearly impossible to control.

So when Pritzker says Americans don’t need a weapon that can fire 60 bullets in a single second, he is not describing an AR-15.

He is describing a fantasy rifle.

A space gun.

A made-up monster used to sell a real ban.

And nobody at the news desk corrected him.

That’s the problem.

A politician can say something completely false about the most popular rifle in America, and millions of people who have never touched one will believe it.

Now they think an AR-15 is basically a handheld minigun.

But if a gun really fired 60 rounds per second, it would be a terrible weapon for a mass shooter.

A standard 30-round magazine would be empty in half a second.

The gun would climb off target immediately.

You would not hit anything.

The nightmare gun Pritzker invented would actually make an attacker worse.

But he needs that fake version of the AR-15 because the real one doesn’t scare people who understand it.

The real AR-15 is a semi-automatic rifle owned by millions of law-abiding Americans for home defense, sport, training, and protecting their families.

And here’s the question anti-gun politicians never answer:

If the AR-15 is too dangerous for regular citizens, why do police get an exception?

The rifle does not become safer because a badge is holding it.

And the citizen is the one facing the threat first.

This AR-15 ban fight is heading to the Supreme Court.

And if the arguments are built on fake gun math like “60 bullets per second,” every gun owner needs to pay attention.

Shop the “America” hat at:

Join Our 2A Membership Club here on YOUTUBE and get these perks:
➡️

Join MY Exclusive 2A Advocacy Text List while AUTOMATICALLY being entered in our monthly 2A Giveaways
➡️

This Video is Brought To You By NOSLER

Let’s Go Brandon Merchandise
➡️

Get UnApologetically 2A Content In Short-Form On YouTube & Help Protect The Second Amendment
➡️

FREE BOOK – If I Only Had One Concealed Carry
➡️

PRO 2A Message Hats In Trucker, Dad, Snapback & More
➡️

Looking to help further our Pro Constitution, Pro 2A message, donate below:

UnApologetically 2A Content Content On Other Platforms:
Twitter –
Instagram –
Facebook –
Gab –
Truth Social-
Youtube Shorts –

#2ANews #ColionNoir

All the Ammo is Sponsored By NOSLER, the Official ammunition partner of Colion Noir

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

25 COMMENTS

  1. This guy has no idea what he’s talking about or he just flat out lying. And it he knows what he’s talking about. He’s just stupid. I mean this guy is dumb. First of all there’s not a gun out there that fires 60 bullets in one second not even the military has such a weapon.

  2. “We can stand for the 2nd Amendment, and allow people to have weapons to defend themselves.”

    There are two subtle but very bad assumptions in that statement. They are indicative of his mindset, and the mindset of all too many others.

    The first is that they, the government, are “allowing” us to have a weapon. The 2nd Amendment is pretty clear on that. In fact that is it’s sole purpose for existence – the government is explicitly forbidden from taking on the role of “allowing” or conversely “disallowing” (aka infringing upon) our right to keep and bear arms. This shows he really does not understand nor support the 2nd Amendment.

    The second assumption is that people would be justified in owning firearms to defend themselves. No such qualification should exist. Does that mean various firearms specialized in form and function for competition shouldn’t be allowed? Nor firearms specialized for hunting? Or merely collectors pieces that will spend their entire existence in a display case? Once you accept the notion of “for defensive purposes” you’re opening the door to disallow other purposes. Worse, you’re rights are now at the mercy of whoever gets to decide what is a valid defensive concern or need, and what is an appropriate firearm to address that. How about “It isn’t up to you buddy. Never has been, never will be.”

  3. A couple of points. Once again tge so called governor of Illinois is lying and he knows he’s lying. Secondly, the Democrat Party is the perfect example of why our Founding Fathers gave us the Second Amendment, it is a deterrent to tyranny, hence the Democrats utter hatred for it.

  4. Only mini guns can fire that fast. A true machine gun, like an M60, can only fire ~600 rounds/min. That's only 10/sec. An M240 is slightly faster, but still like 15/sec at best. These people don't know WTF they're talking about! They're just pushing an agenda to keep the American people down.

Leave a Reply