Home AR-15 Bombshell Decision Instantly Blocking ATF’s Pistol Brace Rule Nationwide In Motion!!!

Bombshell Decision Instantly Blocking ATF’s Pistol Brace Rule Nationwide In Motion!!!

463
37

In this video I have an important update on the ATF’s pistol brace rule and Today’s 5th Circuit arguments!
🇺🇸 Support the Channel🇺🇸
Join USCCA
BlackoutCoffee:
Code: “ArmedScholar” for 10% Off

🎥 Follow Me On Other Social Media 🎥
Instagram:
Twitter:
Twitch:

📷 My YouTube Setup 📷
Camera: (Sony A7siii)
Lens: (Tamron 17-28)
Lighting: (GVM RGB)
Microphone: (Rode Wireless)
Camera Stand: (Broadcast Boom)

Legal Disclaimer: This content is not intended to provide any legal guidance or advice. Although I am a licensed attorney I am not providing any legal advice through this video. If you have any legal questions please contact a licensed professional in your area to address your specific issues.

DISCLAIMER: This video and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. This helps support my channel and allows us to continue making awesome videos like this. Thank you for the support!

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

37 COMMENTS

  1. Sooooooo ……….. nothing has changed has it ? ……. So the braces in the future MIGHT be considered ILLEGAL at a point ? ……. It’s more mud on the already murky waters about this subject, are they LEGAL? ILLEGAL? ……. my understanding is that the injunction could be defeated and the a t f would get away to make their own rules to pander or support the powers at be.

  2. The ATF is getting utterly fucked and I'm willing to bet I'm not alone in watching them get fucked while laughing my ass off. They fucked around, and the find out is too good to not bring snacks to!

  3. QUESTION: Someone….ANYONE…. Please explain how this organization now CLAIMED that the pistol brace ban "rule" was "ONLY" a "letter to the public for interpretation….." when in fact they BLATANTLY THREATENED LEGAL FIREARM OWNERS WITH EXTREMELY SEVERE, UNUSUAL, AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL PUNISHMENTS SUCH AS: BEING CONVICTED OF A FELONY, AS WELL AS HAVING TO PAY A S&*^ LOAD OF $$$$, when a crime, and ONLY A CRIME, CAN AND WILL CARRY SUCH STIFF AND HARSH PENALTIES and PUNISHMENTS!!!????? A "letter of interpretation….🤥?????" I think NOT!!!! Backpedaling…..??? I highly think SO!!! Thank you in advance for any input, opinions or answers.

  4. Are you kidding the ATF is unconstitutional and so is the FBI and the DEA and the fda All of these are organizations that bypass Congress and senate they are grossly unconstitutional They say they are not writing laws they are writing regulations well I'm sorry if that regulation removes rights or threatens you with jail time or finds it is a law They are all marxist liar institutions Inalienable is inalienable I don't care if your Charles Manson There is nothing unclear about the language that is used If these organizations did not exist people like manson would be removed by natural selection and not sitting in prison's taking taxpayer dollars

  5. I am all for 2A but can we also be honest and acknowledge that a pistol with a stabilizing brace is actually an SBR. They look that way, they are used that way (by shouldering the brace), etc. Sorry to say that, but mathematically speaking, it is what it is.

  6. Until We the People tell the federal district, circuit, appeals, and Supreme Court to go pound sand, that there is no law to be regulating that of bearing arms, period, we deserve the shyt that we are being fed.

Leave a Reply