Federal Judge in Washington State refuses to enjoin Washington’s “assault weapon” ban and denies plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction. Mark Smith breaks down the opinion, which can be found here:
—————–
TIMESTAMPS
—————–
0:00 Terrible Opinion Just Entered
0:44 AR Ban NOT Enjoined
2:05 In Common Use Test
3:18 SCOTUS Quote Applied
5:20 Arms Definition & Burden of Proof
7:04 What Gov’t Needs to Prove
8:50 How Much Evidence Do You Need?
11:24 Self-Defense Argument
13:42 Heller vs Bruen Conflation
15:03 History & Interest Balancing
17:34 JUDGE IS WRONG
20:34 Thank You!
—————–
Follow Along On Social Media
—————–
The Four Boxes Diner serves up hot, fresh Second Amendment news and analysis. You’ll get the inside scoop from constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, a member of the United States Supreme Court Bar, a professor, a frequent Fox News guest, and a New York Times bestselling author. Mark’s books include The Official Handbook of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, First They Came for the Gun Owners, and Duped: How the Anti-gun Lobby Exploits the Parkland School Shooting, and How Gun Owners Can Fight Back. Mark’s scholarship has been used by lawyers before the U.S. and he work has been quoted by a federal judge (Roger Benitez) in declaring California’s so-called “assault weapon” ban to be unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.
To defend your liberty, you need to understand the “four boxes” of American liberty: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box. We give you the information you need, and we hope to serve as your source for Bill of Rights news and analysis.
—————–
SUMMARY
—————–
Mark, it was Foghorn Leghorn with the rakes. Wiley Coyote was explosives and anvils.
Not one of Reagen's best nominations
There are no judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789.
Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statutes and codes
(FRC. V. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428, 1 Stat. 138-178)
There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators.
(FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v PE 261 US 428 1Stat. 138-178)
the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war.
See Republica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)
…has been a crown corp tool since 1601 started as the Virginia company
Clearfield Trust Co. vs. UNITED STATES 318 US 363 (1942) [APPENDIX A]
Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor & Aldermen of the City of Savannah. 14 Georgia 438, 520 which states "But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution, the Constitution, it is true, is a compact but he is not a party to it."
UNITED STATES CODE, TITLE 42, SECTION 1988:
When any court violates the clean and unambiguous language of the Constitution, a fraud is perpetrated and no one is bound to obey it.”
State v. Sutton, 63 Minn. 147 65 NW 262 30 ALR 660;
Also see Watson v. Memphis, 375 US 526; 10 L Ed 529; 83 S.Ct. 1314
The jurisdictional area of this United States is limited only to the District of Columbia (not
exceeding a ten mile square) and the Possessions and Territories (i.e., Guam, Puerto Rico, U.S.
Virgin Islands, etc.), belonging to and under the exclusive Sovereignty of the United States. This
United States does NOT include the 50 states, except for lands, which were specifically ceded to
the United States for purposes such as setting up military bases, federal buildings, etc. The 50
sovereign states DO NOT belong to the United States. [The 50 states belong to the Sovereign
PEOPLE]. In the territorial States (but NOT in the 50 states) the United States is Sovereign and
exercises exclusive and absolute legislative authority. This "other" United States is a corporate
entity with the deceptive "trade names" of "The United States" and the "U.S." This information
will refer to this "other" United States as the [District] United States.
Following are areas, which are under territorial United States jurisdiction:
1. The District of Columbia
2. Puerto Rico
3. U.S. Virgin Islands
4. Guam
5. Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands
6. America Samoa
7. Northern Mariana Islands
****Volume 20: Corpus Juris Sec. Section 1785:
"The United States Government is a foreign corporation with respect to a state"
NY re: Merriam 36 N.E. 505 141 S.Ct.1973, 41 L.Ed.287
Well he’s a judge. However seems to be more of a libertard
I hope the Supreme Court gets one of these cases so they can see the conflation of Heller and Bruen and say, in their polite legal speak "That's not what the fuck we said."
Also, angry Mark is best Mark.
Wash state is so corrupt, and I live here. Between a bought off ‘legal’ system and so-called ‘homeless’ situation, if I could leave, a heart beat… just keeping my head down, know what I mean??😢
The judge is woke just like Gov. Inslee, St. Att. Gen. Furgison, and State House of Rep leader "Angry Woman." You should see her face! LOL
It's not about facts with activist judges. It's about their personal feelings and what they like and dislike.
Oh, they understand just fine….they just choose to ignore the Supreme Court and they willingly choose to act as the tyrants that they are. They being the District and Appellate Courts
One could argue that the a weapons existence and fact of ownership is creating a defense. People are less likely to perpetrate a certain level of violence if they know they're force out-matched.
It’s not difficult to believe when politicians (and donors) tell or pressure judges to do what they say. This is obvious in this case .
Washington state is as far left as Oregon and California. Reality, the Constitution, and the rule of law is anathema to them.
Another STATE OF TYRANNY!!
It baffles me how such intelligent, educated people can be so "STUCK ON STUPID"!!! They believe they can tell the average person anything because they are smarter.
The SCOTUS is playing with fire not responding to the lawlessness of the lower courts!!
Some simple logic. If A>B then C=D does not mean that if A<B then C!=D.
Man, talk to us, stop screaming.
This Judge Bryan is just an Anti – Gunner so his decision was no mistake on his part he is just an Anti – Gunner that's it 🚫
I was expecting an inferior court to channel US Supreme Court Chief Justice telling Dred Scott that he had no standing and therefore case is rejected with prejudice.
Dumping the doctrine of "innocent until the STATE proves you are guilty" and mandating that the accused must prove innocence is really dangerous because the COURT decides what is admissible evidence. Ruling that anything proving innocence is inadmissible makes it impossible to prove innocence. When rights are denied for whatever reason, requiring the person stripped of rights to prove that it's not legal to do so is impossible because the judge can exclude any such proof.
What can be done to rein in these judges who are failing to do their jobs properly?
… Did ANYONE ELSE, think to themselves;
… This CRACK HEAD, just said he's EMBARRASSED for OTHER PEOPLE ???
… I'M GUESSING he HASN'T LOOKED INTO A MIRROR LATELY
Maybe judge Bryan has not yet read NYSRPA. Or Heller. Or Caitano. Or McDonald. Or amendment #2 of the Constitution!
Keep the aspidistra flying!
Spot on
Time to shit can the district courts
What is the mechanism for getting rid of a rogue judge? Regardless of the difficulty it needs to happen
This and many other cases demonstrate that many prejudice toward reaching their desired outcome. The only question for them is how much mental gymnastics they need to do to make the legal justification. For some that they don't go beyond what the people will endure or the superior courts will tolerate. This is using Choo-choo logic to justify his legal biased outcome. He doesn't care if he forces the appeal at greater legal experience to the citizens or bastardizes The Constitution.
Will have a local municipalities decided to ban Black people from voting. Would that be legal? The answer is no. So an A.R. 15 man should not be legal either. Shall not be infringed!
Evidently that judge needs impeached.
These are literally the tyrants the founders warned us about