Home AR-15 AR-15s Are Twice as Popular as Ford F-150s, Judge Rules “Assault Weapons”...

AR-15s Are Twice as Popular as Ford F-150s, Judge Rules “Assault Weapons” Ban Unconstitutional

787
19

Judge Benitez AR-15s

“There are probably more modern rifles in circulation than there are Ford F-150 pickup trucks.”

Those are the words of Judge Roger T. Benitez of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California when he handed down the ruling that California’s Assault weapon ban was unconstitutional.
➡️

I just want to say, “God Bless this man for having the cojones to make the legally sound judicial decisions that he makes regarding the second amendment considering he’s in one of the most, if not most, anti-gun districts in the world.

Judge Roger T Benitez is to the legal protection of the second amendment in the southern district of California what Steph Curry is to the art of 3 point shooting.

In 2017 he blocked a California law that would have banned magazines of more than 10 rounds.

He also stopped enforcement of a California law that would require background checks for anyone who purchases ammo and now he has ruled that California’s assault weapon ban is unconstitutional.

So what happens now? Well, we wait.

There’s a 30 day stay on this ruling so right now everything stays the same for the next 30 days while the Attorney General of California Rob Bonta, runs over to his anti-gun buddies on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to beg for an appeal because Rob Bonta is so promiscuously anti-gun that any ruling that protects peoples rights under the second amendment he’s going to be against.

The vast majority of the 9th Circuit court of Appeals is just as anti-gun as Rob Bonta is.

5 times now anytime there has been a positive ruling in favor of the second amendment, the 9th Circuit court has granted a review asking for more judges to take a look at the case, so more than likely, Bonta is going to get his Appeal and thus, 30 days becomes a lot longer.

Because this is the same court that ruled that you do not have a right to carry a gun in public, I’m pretty confident they’re going to engage in some legal alchemy to find a way to reverse this decision.

At this point, the plaintiff, in this case, will likely try to appeal the case to the supreme court, where I honestly think we stand a better chance at winning, and once the Supreme Court rules, it won’t just affect California, it will affect every state and we could likely say bye-bye to any assault weapon bans in the near future.

This will all take a lot of time because the anti-gun lobby can do a lot of damage to the second amendment in the meantime.

So Yes, this is a victory for the second amendment but we only won a small battle in a much bigger war, and we might not see the fruits of our labor for some time to come.

That being said, If the anti-gun lobby was smart, they’d tell Bonta to chill with filing an appeal and take the “L”.

YES, AR-15s are protected by the second amendment. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

It didn’t say only handguns it said ARMS.

AR-15s are protected by the 2nd amendment Merch
➡️

Defund Gun Control
➡️

Help US Further our Pro Constitution, Pro 2A message:

GUNS ARE ESSENTIAL Merchandise
➡️

Keep America Tactical Merchandise
➡️

Come And Take It
➡️

If I Only Had One Concealed Carry – FREE Book
➡️

To Order Your PRO 2A Hats Click Here:
➡️

FOLLOW ME ON:
Twitter –
Instagram –
Facebook –

#GunsAreEssential

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

19 COMMENTS

  1. yea and in all those mass shootings u stupid tv shill chick on Today Tardo show
    most are handguns actually but u dont report on Black on black or Black Criminal White/Asian victim unless u thought the criminal was a white person
    then u be like false alarm when they not white
    in all those mass shootings the people being targeted were obeying laws but they also were using there right to bear arms or they could have just shot the criminal trna shoot them
    u dont report on the Shootings stoped by people with guns who were at the locaton at the time
    Cause u are fake news narritive for gloalist to push globalist communism And it will end the same way as it ended for nazis In Neurumburg Trials for all yall Traitors n oathbreakers

  2. if the government is tryna disarm the law abiding citzens with laws against guns
    which criminals never followed and still wont follow when u add more
    then chances are said goernment is either doing something or gonna do something you would kill them for
    they have no Authority to take any arms
    all fire arms are arms
    and Any Tech Offensive Defensive, or intel from military is also arms
    as they are called? Arms branches of military
    everything was written clear the problem is they dont follow the constitutiton As written and they use words that they changed the definiiton to fit there narritive

  3. The same people, (predominantly "Ds"*) who want to disarm citizens, want to decriminalize actual criminal conduct and release violent recidivists.

    Up is down, right is wrong.

  4. The term "Assault Weapon" is a joke. You can board an airplane with a ballpoint pen but not a nail clipper. I'm sure someone can do more damage with a ballpoint pen than a nail clipper. Any and everything is an "Assault Weapon" depending on how you choose to use it.

  5. They got mad because he asked for one so he could see how its modular and understand the gun better… hes a true moderate and one you could work with thank the lord above we have this man

Leave a Reply