Home AR-15 Gun Expert Demonstrates Difference Between Bump Stock Semi-Auto, Full Automatic Weapons

Gun Expert Demonstrates Difference Between Bump Stock Semi-Auto, Full Automatic Weapons

735
28

ATF confirmed Las Vegas gunman had 12 weapons modified with bump stocks.

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

28 COMMENTS

  1. If everything is legal, when do we Purge? Some have already begun, Im jist waiting for it to be officially said; I have a rocket launcher Ive been wanting to test out. Stupid NRA. While ppl are dying in the hands of easy access to guns, he's been rakin it in. LaPierre, I hope one day it hits home, that way you understand what a mother goes through when she loses her 9 yr old child.

  2. An automatic weapon that is not placed on a bipod or a mounted vehicle is not acurrate enought to kill more people faster than a semiautoamatic one. By prohibiting automatics you are reducing property damage and increasing death.

  3. "still working to determine if they were fully automatic". exactly what are they working on? Pretty freaking easy to tell…even without ammo. Plenty of vids showing how to bump fire without a special stock too. And it clearly doesn't make it a machine gun. He had several hiccups when shooting the bump fire. It's a very clumsy device.

  4. love how in the "experiment" when he fires the bumpstock he stops twice to aim causing the fire rate to be lower. If he fired the bumpstock at the same rate he fired the automatic weapon he would have been closer to 10-15 rounds per second like the automatic weapon. If you are going to do such experiments…try keeping the control groups the same…you know keep the trigger pressed the entire time for both bump stock and automatic weapons.

  5. 43 weapons firing for what seems like days yet hotel room had less than 100 casings did he call housekeeping after he ran out of rounds ? um yeah can you send someone up….my carpet is dirty

  6. I don’t think there is a full auto AR-15, it would be AR Varients, but not an AR-15. It would be like an HK 416/417 or M16’s, a lot of them but no AR-15 is fully auto because the AR-15 is the Civilian Version of the M16’s

  7. If the military can own it, then why can’t we? If someone were to commit mass murder, they’d have more success without using a bump stock, you burn through too much ammo with a bump stock, you’d be more efficient with your shot if you are using semi auto, Therefore more kills and less reloading. I’m not crazy or would I ever commit such an act, I just think logically

  8. Why are we focused on whether a gun can fire full auto or not? Full auto doesn't make the gun any better, you sacrifice accuracy and wast ammunition. Semi auto conserves ammo and creates more deliberate aim. Military's have realized this in the past with guns like the Soviet SVT-40 that used to fire full auto, but they realized it was not as effective as semi-auto, so they ordered troops to stop using the full auto mode, and redesigned the rifle with out it.

    We're getting focused on the wrong things here

Leave a Reply