
[Best Zooming Power?] – Nikon Aculon A211 10X42 Vs. Olympus 10X50 S Binoculars
Both the Nikon Aculon A211 10×42 and Olympus 10×50 S binoculars offer solid zooming capabilities, but there are some differences in performance, optics, and design. Here’s a side-by-side comparison:
1. Magnification and Lens Size
Nikon Aculon A211 10×42:
Magnification: 10x
Objective Lens Diameter: 42mm
Ideal for slightly better portability and moderate light-gathering capacity, suitable for daytime use and casual stargazing.
Olympus 10×50 S:
Magnification: 10x
Objective Lens Diameter: 50mm
Larger objective lenses allow more light, which may give better low-light performance, ideal for dusk, dawn, or low-light stargazing.
2. Field of View
Nikon Aculon A211 10×42: Around 341 feet at 1000 yards
Olympus 10×50 S: Approximately 342 feet at 1000 yards
The Olympus has a very slightly wider field of view, but it’s almost negligible.
3. Optical Quality
Nikon Aculon A211: Uses multicoated eco-glass lenses for improved image brightness and clarity.
Olympus 10×50 S: Offers anti-reflective lens coatings for decent brightness and color clarity but may not match Nikon’s multicoating in color fidelity.
4. Weight and Portability
Nikon Aculon A211 10×42: Around 755 grams (1.7 lbs), making it a bit lighter.
Olympus 10×50 S: Roughly 855 grams (1.88 lbs), which might feel heavier for prolonged use.
5. User Comfort and Ease of Use
Nikon Aculon A211: Has a smooth central focus knob and rubber-coated grip for easier handling.
Olympus 10×50 S: Features non-slip rubber coating and a comfortable eyecup design.
Conclusion
If you’re prioritizing better light-gathering for low-light conditions, the Olympus 10×50 S might have a slight edge due to its 50mm objective lens. However, if you value portability and sharper color fidelity, the Nikon Aculon A211 10×42 is a solid choice. For zooming power alone, both provide 10x magnification, so overall image quality and comfort will likely guide the final decision.
Timestamp
0:00 – Introduction
0:31 – TEST 1 (Olympus)
1:52 – TEST 1 (Nikon)
3:15 – Side by side (Olympus & Nikon)
4:12 – TEST 2 (Olympus)
5:33 – TEST 2 (Nikon)
6:57 – Side by side (Olympus & Nikon)
🛍️ Links to Binoculars:
🔍 Equipment Links ( Buy here ) ~
Olympus Binocular 10×50 S :
Nikon Aculon A211 10×42 Binocular :
Other equipment used:
iPhone11:
GoPro HERO8
DIGITEK® (DPTR 605 VD) (183 cm) Professional Heavy Duty Tripod:
Manfrotto MVH500A-Fluid Video Head 60mm Half Ball -Black:
Note: Below are my affiliate links, when you buy from them I get a small commission which will help me run the channel 🙂 Thank you !!
For business enquiry:
Mail me: krishnadebo1958@gmail.com
#NikonAculonA211, #Olympus10X50S, #Binoculars, #OutdoorGear, #Magnification, #BirdWatching, #Stargazing, #HikingGear
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.



Olympus is winner
Am not finding any difference in side by side view
what would you recommend for astronomy: Nikon Aculon A211 10×50 or Olympus 10×50 S? They cost almost the same in my country.
Nikon 🥇
on dirait qu’en plus le zoom est plus fort !
What you think about athlon & vortex..
Aculon is winner. I 've aculon 8X42 A211 model since 10 years. It is worth the price on every occassion. We use it for bird watching / tele zoom. We could even see persons standing 1 kms apart in high mountain from our house. We even tried to do sign with hands from mountain and interpret from home 🙂
Hii bro i watch your all videos and find best binoculars under 3500 so you help and advice me