Home AR-15 Federal Judges Rule AR-15s Are Not Protected By The Second Amendment

Federal Judges Rule AR-15s Are Not Protected By The Second Amendment

1037
20

📲 Subscribe to @ColionNoir Here:

A 3 judge panel of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit overturned an injunction against Illinois’ “assault weapons” ban, deciding that AR-15s are not protected by the Second Amendment.

The Ronald Raegan & Bill Clinton appointees Frank Easterbrook and Diane P. Wood constituted the panel majority in overturning the injunction. They noted that Heller (2008) held, “like most rights, the right secured by the Second Amendment is not unlimited.”

The level of irony in a decision like this is mind-numbing.

Can someone please explain to me how a rifle that was specifically designed for civilian use, is on the lower end of power compared to other rifles, and is the most popular rifle in the country is not protected by the Second Amendment? The Second Amendment doesn’t specify the right to keep and bear only certain guns that don’t scare the government; it states the right to keep and bear ARMS.

The 2 Judges went on to note that in Heller, the Supreme Court of the United States found that machine guns were not protected under the Second Amendment because they were not “bearable” arms, and that is “because they can be dedicated exclusively to military use.”

Easterbrook and Wood then focused on similarities they found between AR-15s and M16s, the latter of which can be fired in full-auto or three-round burst modes. They wrote:

“The similarity between the AR-15 and the M16 only increases when we take into account how easy it is to modify the AR-15 by adding a “bump stock” (as the shooter in the 2017 Las Vegas event had done) or auto-sear to it, thereby making it, in essence, a fully automatic weapon. In a decision addressing a ban on bump stocks enacted by the Maryland legislature, another federal court found that bump-stock devices enable “rates of fire between 400 to 800 rounds per minute.”

They also noted that both guns use the same ammunition and “deliver the same kinetic energy.”

Please watch this ridiculous ruling and comment and get our NEW release Hoodies:

New Release!! Embroidered Premium Hoodies
➡️

2nd Amendment In Shape Of Rifle (AR-15s are Protected by the 2nd Amendment Merchandise)
➡️

Shop The Best Pro 2A Conversation Starter Merch:
➡️

Join Our 2A Membership Club here on YOUTUBE and get these perks:
➡️

Join MY Exclusive 2A Advocacy Text List while AUTOMATICALLY being entered in our monthly 2A Giveaways
➡️

Let’s Go Brandon Merchandise
➡️

Get UnApologetically 2A Content In Short-Form On YouTube & Help Protect The Second Amendment
➡️

FREE BOOK – If I Only Had One Concealed Carry
➡️

PRO 2A Message Hats In Trucker, Dad, Snapback & More
➡️

Looking to help further our Pro Constitution, Pro 2A message, donate below:

UnApologetically 2A Content Content On Other Platforms:
Twitter –
Instagram –
Facebook –
Gab –
Truth Social-
Youtube Shorts –

#2ANews #ColionNoir #DefensiveGunUse

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

20 COMMENTS

  1. Wish I had a time machine so I could go back and look over Madison's shoulder… "no no no, write it as if you're trying to explain it to a bunch of retarded toddlers."

  2. They'll learn the hard way. Judge Easterbrook is forever full of errors in his opinions, constantly being criticized. I expect we'll see more of him being criticized by the supreme Court.

  3. The big problem is that judges no longer feel they work for the people but are beholding to elitists and politicians. They constantly override their oaths and forget who they work for. They will always find for
    the govt that seemingly pays their salaries. However, Judges should always find for the People and Constitution over corruptable and power greedy govt.

Leave a Reply