Home Nikon Scope Zoom Compared at 1 mile, 1,000 and 500 Yards!

Scope Zoom Compared at 1 mile, 1,000 and 500 Yards!

618
40

Get a Sightron from the video here; great for long range shooting!

Get the Vortex from the video here; a great value with a great warranty.

If you would like to support the channel further here is my Patreon Link

Have you wondered what Zoom is best for long range? or how to choose the correct amount of zoom for your rifle scope for 1,000 yards? In this video I set up a full size IPSC target and look through my optic at 1,760 1,000 and 500 Yards to give you an idea of how much detail each zoom provides and give you an idea of how your current scope might look. Scope zoom at long range is a personal preference so here is a look at multiple ranges compared directly.

Scopes used in this video;
Sightron SIII 8-32×56 MOA Second focal plane
Vortex Viper PST gen 1 6-24×50 MOA first focal plane

Follow me on Instagram

🇺🇸Get 10% off your order of ADG Brass using code WDS10 during checkout!

I have a podcast, The Muzzle Blast Podcast!

Spotify

Apple Podcasts (iTunes)

Google Podcasts

Amazon affiliate links anything bought from these links helps my channel and you get a great product! Doesn’t cost you extra!

Scopes
My #1 pick for a LR scope! Only 300$
! SWFA SS 12X MOA !
! SWFA SS 12X MIL !
My Vortex scope
New model PST scope

Rifle accessories
Vortex bubble level
Caldwell pivot bipod
Fake atlas
Nikon 4k rangefinder
Camo paint
Muzzle brakes

Reloading
Highly recommend! Digital reloading scale only 18$!
Lee complete reloading kit
Lee ultimate dies
Lyman chamfer tool kit
Universal Reloading tray
Target shoot n see targets

How I survive the Desert climate!
Personal Favorite! Carhartt hoodie
Carhartt Full swing steel Coat
Carhartt coveralls
Backpack Velox 2
Edge glasses
Shemagh scarf
Sun hat

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

40 COMMENTS

  1. I really appreciate the details you laid out in this video! The details certainly do reveal the specific operational use of the two zoom capabilities, and how the user will experience these. I dislike making judgements based on price points, rather judgement should be based on capability and useability.

  2. Id love to see this done with a 2.5x fixed scope (either just a cheap one, or one of the fancy m73 scope clones). it would be cool to see what the view would be through a Springfield sniper scope or a scope of similar power

  3. Retracting my like…why are there no shots taken??? You can look all you want, but there is 0 proof of accuracy. I should make a video like this but showing moa hits at yardage. Or I can just show a video of me postulating.

  4. Good stuff. I love SFP scopes, but prefer an F-Class style reticle so I utilize a scope that's a little under the radar; a Sightmark Latitude 6.25-25×56 F-Class. Very much worth every single penny of it's price range and perfect for anything I do nowadays at the range or in the field. My old eyes are only good to about 700 yards, and I'm primarily shooting a .22-250, so I have all the set up I need.

  5. Excellent!! I have a Savage 110 FCP Lapua and with this same Vortex Viper gen 1 6x24x50 I should be able to work my way out to 1500 yards, no problem. Correct?
    Thanks for your reply and thank you for the great video.

  6. Both types of focal planes have pros and cons. Being a fan of FFP, I like the ability for the spotter to simply give me holds. Since the reticle grows and shrinks in proportion, the holds are true regardless of magnification. For detail work, quality FFPs don't meet in the center, giving you a very fine "empty" spot for detail work. I prefer this as it frames the impact point rather than obscuring it like a center dot on a SFP. Use both and see which one fits your personal style & needs appropriately. One thing I will say for both is that if you're hunting at dusk, an illuminated reticle can be quite helpful in a good number of situations.

  7. While I am late to this video, I feel duty bound to comment that this is the single most valuable content I have found thus far discussing FFP and SFP. Thank you so much for this!

  8. When I first got into centrefire it was only when I found your video posts
    that things started to come together, thank you for that 😃.
    I had always liked the 243Win cartridge, so bought a second had Tikka T3X.
    It came with a cheap scope, so I went Vortex, unfortunately I could only afford
    a Diamondback but it works great for me.
    Then I went to your reloading videos and that helped me greatly, so thank you again for those.
    I would be interested in what you would deem to be a good Standard FPS deviation on ammo please?
    Please keep up the great work you do.

  9. coming in in 2022..I still think SFP is the best. FFP is good only for when you want to back off from full magnification a little to get a better sight picture and still be able to use the holdover marks…other than that SFP wins at everything else in my opinion.
    FFP has certainly become the "must have trend". I own a couple and can use them fine but they become almost useless under 10X without illumination.

    With SFP you can still dial down and use your holdovers you just have to do a little thinking, which in a stressful situation isnt ideal, but if you have a 24X power scope that the sub tensions are correct on full power, you can dial down to 12 and double your sub tensions….1MOA at 24X becomes 2MOA at 12X..or 1.5MOA at 18X..Mil is the same.

    In low power scopes like 1-4 to 1-10X I have no clue why they put FFP reticles in those.
    I can see why in higher power scopes but LPVO. it makes zero sense to me

Leave a Reply