BCA 5.56 Upper Review:
Ruger .270 Review:
Mossberg .450BM Review:
Items I use regularly in these videos-
Steel Targets:
Main Camera (smartphone):
Secondary Camera (action cam):
Laptop Computer: TBA
Computer Editing: TBA
Editing App: TBA
Phone Stand/Tripod: TBA
Micro SD Card:
Hearing Protection Ear Muff:
Safety Glasses: TBA
Table: TBA
Ballistic Gelatin Powder:
Bullet/Reloading Scale:
Caliper/Micrometer:
Denim:
Range Finder:
Bag/Rest:
Chronograph:
Target Stand:
8″ Bullseye Shoot-N-See:
12″x12″ Sight In Splatter:
12″x18″ Bullseye Splatter:
18″x24″ Silhouette Splatter:
High Viz Neon Silhouette:
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.
The results were as expected, but the test had to be done so fun is not missed!
And they said 7.62×39 (AK47) is stronger than 5.56 (AR15) ๐๐๐โฆ Iโm sticking with AR15. Got two already Iโm getting more in the future.
.270 was my dad's favorite hunting caliber, therefore, .270 is my favorite hunting caliber!
BS!
OMG You are slaughtering some of my favorite food. Next time you do this let me know and I'll show up with a fork!
5 star videos
Fruit is not a good comparison, people or animals have bone and varying tissues.
You want a good comparison? Go buy some whole uncooked chickens and shoot those. I already know the result, the 7.62×39 destroys the chicken, while the 5.56 leaves it more intact.
Fruit is not ideal for comparing bullets because youโre prob not going to see all the energy dump into it. Fruit isnโt as dense as living things and lack bones, obviously.
Cool video
I am๐ the bush master!
Would be different if you would have used a harnady sst for 762
Try a 20 inch barrel 762 not a chance straight through is the best thing that can ever have better then a 556 at a 800 yards with a 20 inch 762 at 800 yards
I pick 762 because the impact on body armour is PAINFUL being shot from one at Afghanistan with a level 4 full body armour vs a 556 being shot at u the pain is ALOT DIFFERENT i seen a big monster Taliban take a 556 with a us marine level 4 vest probably stole he tanked it like a champ
But when firing a 20 inch mk2 762 sniper to the vest that hoes kids flash before his eyes man took a big hit from a 762 20 inch vs that 20 inch 556
762 may not penetrate but it may knock the FUCK out a 250 pound muscle man taliban
over a 556 to the chest
Not to mention the bullet drop on it but that range with a 762 at 1000 yards full auto is a good capability
I'm sure those cantaloupes deserved it
5.56 great for people 7.62 better for 4 legged threats so bigger game 7.62 does a better job not to mention if it hits bone 7.62 will tumble quick
I think watermelons must have a higher water content so thereโs more hydrostatic shock happening. Cantaloupes seem like better fruits to compare bullets though. You can see which ones penetrate and which ones tumble. Also the difference when you got up to the 270 and higher was pretty awesome.
The 556 was designed to wound, no to kill. The idea was to take 3 men off the battlefield instead of one.
Velocity is why!
450 bushmaster is the guy she told you not to worry about..
Watermelon has more water in it. Causing it to react better
I have deer and turkey on my range too .
Curious to see that 300 blk vs 350 legend
Cantaloupes just aren't going to be as reactive as a watermelon. The cantaloupe has a much lower liquid content, as well as having a central cavity filled with seeds.
762 is great but there is a good reason Russia made the 545 and why china would adopt their own 5.8 variant.
Obviously, 556 isn't without its own limitations too. The real draw for 556, aside from speed, is its fragmentation.
Although, without an appropriate-length barrel (20in preferably, anything less than 16in is getting bad fast), performance suffers drastically.
Also: 545 > 556 ๐
Hey man, I have a possible video Idea. Would you consider doing a velocity test of m193 from different companies like winchester, American eagle, etc? I feel like m193 has been watered down a lot.
The . 556 must have started to tumble.
That was quite a bit more interesting than most of these types of test. It shows that paper analysis doesn't usually tell the whole story
Albeit, the exit was far greater with the .223, you showed the entrance, not the exit regarding the 7.62.
Impressive results! If I were going on a cantelope hunt tomorrow I'd look hard at the 450 Bushmaster
Ballistic tips make the difference?
5.56 m855A1 end of story
WhoaHohoho….the 450 wins
nice comparisons …
7.62×39 fmj just cant transfer that energy non solid target like that.
But when it comes to hunting i think it will do more consistent damage to target
than 223/5.56 which will either pass trough or blow up depending does it
have speed to tumble or not.
But in reality it comes to what you hunt and do you want eat it afterwards.
Little pests which you are not gonna eat then 5.56 because why not.
For deer and similiar size of game i think 7.62 will perform overally better
when there is actually mass to take that energy.
5.56 may initially look captivating, initial impact.
However, 7.62×39 begins to show its worth after 6-8inches… past that point, the projectile begins to tumble/yaw & reveal the desired damage, outcome.
Plenty of YouTube vids that show this when ballistic gel & FBI protocol is used.
๐๐
Love it dude ๐๐ฝ In the name of science, I think the cantaloupes are the bees knees showing comparison. ๐งช The Anderson and Bear Creak Arsenal are holding it down.
That .270 FMJ is nasty
Show us where the cantaloupe touched you!