Judge Frank Easterbrook of the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals entered a stay of Judge McGlynn’s order enjoining the enforcement of Illinois’s bans on semi-auto rifles and magazines. Mark Smith discusses this decision and talks about Judge Easterbrook’s prior rulings against 2nd Amendment rights.
—————–
TIMESTAMPS
—————–
0:00 Judge Fail
0:39 Judge Easterbrook’s Background
1:49 Case Background
2:59 Easterbrook Anti-2A History
4:46 Easterbrook Invented 2A standard
6:16 Thomas & Scalia Response
12:04 Judge Easterbrook Errors
15:34 What Could Happen…
16:35 Thank You!
—————–
Follow Along On Social Media
—————–
The Four Boxes Diner serves up hot, fresh Second Amendment news and analysis. You’ll get the inside scoop from constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, a member of the United States Supreme Court Bar, a professor, a frequent Fox News guest, and a New York Times bestselling author. Mark’s books include The Official Handbook of the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, First They Came for the Gun Owners, and Duped: How the Anti-gun Lobby Exploits the Parkland School Shooting, and How Gun Owners Can Fight Back. Mark’s scholarship has been used by lawyers before the U.S. and he work has been quoted by a federal judge (Roger Benitez) in declaring California’s so-called “assault weapon” ban to be unconstitutional under the Second Amendment.
To defend your liberty, you need to understand the “four boxes” of American liberty: the soap box, the ballot box, the jury box, and the ammunition box. We give you the information you need, and we hope to serve as your source for Bill of Rights news and analysis.
—————–
SUMMARY
—————–
ROUGE ANTI-GUN JUDGE TRYING TO IGNORE SCOTUS ON AR-15 BAN CASE…
It would seem to me that Judge Easterbrook is "set in his ways" and refuses to acknowledge and follow SCOTUS's findings. We are talking several cases, including those which were his cases that were overturned. What do we do about "activist" or obstinate judges like this? Shouldn't Easterbrook be "forced" to follow Case Law or be Removed?
Horse Hockey Pucks
I believe that was the word you were looking for the ruling by this particular judge was complete horse hockey pucks
Oh yeah and then you need to make a law that is against the law to do anythanks that has to do with taking away constitutional right? I'll try to escape around them if you do anything like that. That should be a automatic 5 year original sentence and that's just the warning.
ATF is a dysfunctional organizatit works against the people. Instead of For the people😮
What in the world is going on you know like? Maybe what 56 cases supposed to be in front of this free import? Yes get rid of the a t anybody recognize this as a dysfunctional organization
I would argue that all arms used by the military are common use arms and are therefore legal to own!
Would the founding fathers fight a modern war with muskets? HELL NO!! They would advocate for the most effective, high capacity, automatic weapons available!!
Easterbrook was a Regan appointee and Regan did sign the Mulford Act. 8:03
What's sad is all these local and state judges who defy whatever the Supreme Court puts forth on any 2nd amendment. I guess these judges don't realize the Supreme Court always had the final say. But since Biden was elected his administration and these local and state judges just don't give to shits about the Supreme Court.
This "judge", and the Circuit Court he claims to represent, is 🗑️. He will be the laughing stock of the Second Amendment as he will set in motion for striking down the AWB nationwide.
What DOES INFRINGE mean????????👀🤭😻❤️❤️
🖖✅✅✅✅👍👍💪💪🇺🇸👏👏👏👏👏
i don't care about where he stands with the SC. they get strange some times too. i want to know why he can't follow the constitution.
As much as this is news or entertainment the fact is they will keep these guns ban , it’s back & forth when they all truly don’t want citizens to have them, as much as gun lovers want to hope, you know the outcome
"Common use" is made-up nonsense by SCROTUS. Shall not be infringed means shall not be infringed, whether common use or not.
People who parrot SCROTUS garbage, like "common use" are full of BS.
SCROTUS opinions do not override the Constitution.
SCROTUS upheld infringements in Heller and Bruen.
"Judge Easterbrook's Opinion" ….
Sounds like a Democrat 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
This is probably a silly question, but how do Heller and NYSRPA rulings affect other arms?
Judges need to be criminally and civilly liable for their misconduct. Full stop. F*** their “immunity.”
This commie must be removed from the bench immediately.
Is there anything that SCOTUS can do to this judge?
Vomit here – > 🤢
Defying the scotus is treason isnt it ? There for these un just judges and thier unjust laws should be nul and void.
Is there a way to have a judge removed from office for refusing to follow the Supreme Court ruling
What is this “military grade” nonsense. The people have to act as their own military to be a check balance between them and their government. That’s the militia aspect of the second Amendment.
The State and Federal government if allowed to decide what weapons the citizenry would be allowed to possess, will obviously and without a doubt only allow weapons that are so vastly inferior and rudimentary as to be completely worthless for the intended purpose of the 2nd Amendment which is to defend the population against their tyranny.
So, the same judge has defied the SCOTUS twice, at least. What more proof does one need, that all these inferior court judges who as anti-2A, are doing so consciously, and not due to lack of education or clarity.
What is worse is that a judge can continue to act unconstitutionally, again and again, with impunity.
There has to be a mechanism for taking such judges to task and make them accountable for their actions.
Clarence Thomas is a god.
The justices should not be shocked this is happening. They had an easy opportunity to deal with AWBs in Bianchi v Frosh. Instead, they gave lower courts another couple of years to treat Bruen like they did Heller. This will continue, and Bruen shall remain meaningless in the circuit courts that matter, until SCOTUS begins aggressively taking up 2A cases, which they have refused to do so. They will gladly take a 1A or 4A case almost every year it seems, but not 2A.
Mark, deep down, I know that you're spot-on, correct! Thank you for insightfully exposing this dangerous, corrupted, dysfunctional inferior court judge, Frank Easterbrook.
Frankly, Judge Frank Easterbrook, mister, you suck. You've betrayed the US Constitution and the American people! You are a disgraceful, corrupted POC!
Maybe Judge Easterbrook should be indicated on the Charge of Sedious Treason and be Impeachment, removed from the Bench!
Here’s the weird thing to me …. Why don’t all the various Federal Judges get together every year, have a conference, review what the SCOTUS and the various Disttrict Courts did, and align their views.I’ve been in the Information Security community for a long time and we do that a lot. Not just once a year. Because understanding this stuff is important.
Hopefully Judge Easterbrook gets his pee-pee smacked … with a machete!
It’s pretty simple. These activist judges are IDIOTS.
Still no pro-gun laws in any Democrat state that does not want them. SCOTUS is powerless.
EGO. You are 100% correct . Even I can sense that
Too Long, I loose concentration !!!
Judge Easterbunny knows exactly what he is doing. This is just a big middle finger to SCOTUS.
As long as SCOTUS allows these judges like Easterbunny to continue breaking the law, we will continue to be infringed and continue to lose our freedom. Time for SCOTUS to grow a pair and drop the hammer.
He doesn't deserve to be a supreme court justice if he doesn't know how to read. The second amendment is basic English and he obviously is incapable of reading and comprehending what it entails.
1791
😎 Thanks Mark!
This judge was an erudite individual. I wonder if he's having dementia or possibly alcohol related dementia? He seems unable to process and recall more recent events, experiences.
Judge Easterbrook is FULL OF BULLFEATHERS.