Washington Gun Law President, William Kirk, attempts to summarize ATF’s new 292 page pistol brace rule in less than 10 minutes. This video is not a rant or a rave about the clearly unconstitutional actions of the ATF, as there are plenty out here in the YouTubiverse that have already voiced those obvious concerns. Rather this is a video to help you understand, in simple English, what this really means to you. So arm yourself with education today.
______________________________________________________________________
Applicable Rule:
ATF Final Rule on Stabilizing Braces. ATF 2021R-08F.
_________________________________________________________________
Other Resources:
HUGE WIN on Bump Stocks and What That Means for Pistol Braces.
The One Easy Way Around the Pistol Brace Fiasco.
How Likely Is It That ATF Shows Up to Get Your Pistol?
The HUGE Difference Between Converting a Pistol to a Rifle vs. a Rifle to a Pistol.
All the Terrible Choices the ATF Will Leave You With for Your Pistol Braces.
Check Out our Bullet Point Series.
____________________________________________________________________
Subscribe to us on Rumble.
Remember, you can follow us at www.washingtongunlaw.com
Like us on Facebook at www.facebook.com/WashingtonGunLaw
Follow us on Twitter @GunWashington
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.
A Buffer tube can be shouldered
Tell ATF to fuc off, or in nice terms. Read 2nd amendment Assholes treason fools
Oh,, So now they made it so people will make their AR Pistols More concealable by getting the 3.5 inch buffer tube
So it's legal to take off and just keep the buffer tube?
They can start changing the rules and making new ones against my constitutional rights, I will not comply with government tyranny
The law title states it applies to pistols but in the law term firearm is used. What about braces on non-pistols such as the Mossberg Shockwave?
Can't you replace the brace and tube with a pistol buffer tube? Then there's no question about it being a legal pistol. Correct? Someone please answer. Thanks.
I think it's a ridiculous argument for the ATF this rule has no bearing other than control of the people. I don't own any, I just think it's a mark against Liberty. Bsd people are going to be bad people regardless of any such arbitrary infringements. They only seek to whittle away at the things they say you can have….
Shall Not be Infringed?
Fuck it file a law suit also good job at a quick and informative breakdown of the bs they are trying
Is it still possible to remove the brace and destroy it and avoid any headache with all of this bs
I have a question so if I have a AR-15 with a 7.5 inch barrel and I take off my pistol brace and I put a pistol buffer tube is it still considered a SBR in ATF eyes
So if I just do the form 1 free tax can I just put a regular stock on it? I was planning to sbr it anyways
What concerns me is that this was originally a Trump Admin. move that has been executed by Biden's. It's such a convoluted issue perhaps someone more well read on it could correct me but this doesn't fill me with confidence in Trump's return being a boon for law abiding gun owners.
5 and 6 did not come from no where lmao it says :
Yea we see you idiots on youtube and in forums definitely using this "not-stock accessory clearly engineered to function as a stock without legally being one" as a stock and since you're using this as a stock and think you're being clever we'll just go ahead and classify it as such….maybe you shouldve been less dumb with your marketing and youtube videos.
You people were literally bragging online everytime you thought you found a loophole and now you're surprised that they are responding in kind and closing the gap.
Perhaps I missed it but it seems to be thatyou haven't discussed the listed option of removing the brace and replacing the M4 style buffer tube with a pistol buffer tube that has no stock mounting provision. Because the rule is ambiguous about the back end of the buffer tube alone being a shoulderable surface area, what is your opinion? From my lay person reading of rule it seems the only safe course of action is to replace short barrel with a 16 inch or longer barrel. Of course that assumes one will not opt for the SBR NFA registration.
There is no new rule. The ATF does not make laws or ban shit. It's unconstitutional, and will be struck down by courts, like a their other bs. Sign that registry and they have you on file, illegally. That's all they want. They know this will be struck down. They want as many of you as possible to sign their shit before then.
Everything the ATF does is entrapment = I missed the part where any criminal will be raided or arrested but it’s obvious the goal is to go after AR style weapons and shut down or turn FFL’s for future revenue.
Your a bitch if you comply to this
I have an AR pistol that I put together. I registered the weapon with my local police department as a pistol. Do I need to register with the feds now?
Fuddbusters is saying any separated brace must be destroyed. I don't understand. Is a brace now a stock or not.
I’m still unsure about this, can I just take a brace off, throw it in a drawer and just shoot it with an exposed buffer tube? And maybe cheek it to see through the scope or red dot?
Totalitarian dictatorship
If you wait 60 days before you act you will be two months behind give or take a couple of days. So you will not be useful at all. Because nobody can see you as anything other than somebody waiting to see whether or not it would be worth joining The Fray. You should have your opinion right now and your argument within a couple of days of when the new law comes out. I'll even be so kind as to give you a week to read it and formulate a proper complaint for your lawsuit. This means you got only a couple of days left I want to know on Monday morning what your opinion is are you joining The Fray or not, and what is your argument specifically.
Here in Oregon the BATF did not wait 60 days they waited one week and ignore the courts stay for two days.
The way I understand it there are only two definitions there that are not arbitrary. And the definition that they replace was somewhat arbitrary already. However was pretty much understood to mean that all you needed was a functional firearm and blueprint to improve it. Again bhef considers a sketch on a napkin as blueprints.
Design or redesign made or remade is actually somewhat vage as it does not specifically completed even so much as in the blueprints. However we do know for a fact as in with the drawing of a lightning clip not drawn to size because it was not measured and the place where you bend it was neither marked nor defined as to how far it must be bent and yet the man was arrested for giving a lightning clip to a ATF agent that was working a sting operation. There's three problems with that. There's no way to cut the proper pattern out because you don't have one. There is very little chance that you're going to know where to bend it. And good luck on getting the band right the first time because that's the only chance you're going to get. In addition there's a fourth problem you have a piece of paper and it needs to be made out of metal of a specific hardness and thickness. Good luck with that too
Is the tax exemption only applicable for previously registered pistol? I mean if I buy one or two lower receivers right now and register them as SBR within the 120 days after this new rule publication, do I need to pay the tax stamp?
2ND AMENDMENT WE DONT BOW DOWN OR COMPLY TO ANYONE EVER.