Home AR-15 Uvalde Families Now Suing Daniel Defense Because Shooter Used Their Rifle

Uvalde Families Now Suing Daniel Defense Because Shooter Used Their Rifle

700
44

Daniel Defense Uvalde

Many people will see this and say, ” Oh, it’s just a money grab!”

In many ways, it is, but it’s also a coordinated attack on the 2nd Amendment.

This lawsuit doesn’t hurt any of the government agencies listed because they’ll use your tax dollars to do it if they do have to pay anything.

However, when it comes to suing the company that made the gun that the Uvalde shooter used, what else is it other than a way to destroy the company financially?

No one finds it suspicious that a firm out of California is filing a class action suit based on a shooting in Texas.

Clearly, their argument is a massive reach, but it doesn’t matter because the goal isn’t to win the case; it’s to get them to spend a ton of money fighting a bunch of these stupid cases or simply settling, and it works.

When this lawsuit is filed, it will initially be stopped by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, but they’ll argue that Daniel Defenses’ marketing made the shooter do what he did.

It’s a dumb argument, but it works to get around the federal law that says you can’t just sue a gun company simply because their gun was used.

Join MY Exclusive 2A Advocacy Text List while AUTOMATICALLY being entered in our monthly 2A Giveaways
➡️

IYKYK The Second Amendment Merchandise
➡️

Get UnApologetically 2A Content In Short-Form On YouTube & Help Protect The Second Amendment
➡️

FREE BOOK – If I Only Had One Concealed Carry
➡️

PRO 2A Message Hats In Trucker, Dad, Snapback & More
➡️

Looking to help further our Pro Constitution, Pro 2A message, donate below:

UnApologetically 2A Content Content On Other Platforms:
Twitter –
Instagram –
Facebook –
Gab –
Truth Social-
Youtube Shorts –

#2ANews #ColionNoir

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

44 COMMENTS

  1. Wow they really suing the manufacturer ? Dumbest reason to sue also. Can't blame them. ain't the manufacturer fault. 🤦‍♂️ another reasons so they can put on the medias so they have another reason to ban guns

  2. Calling it a money grab is kinda disrespectful to the families that lost their children. However,I do think they are hitting guns manufacturers where it hurts. I'm all for guns, but something has to be done. We sit here arguing, basically waiting for the next tragedy. Guns are like a virus now. Here to stay like it or not.

  3. We don't sue auto companies for all the alcohol related deaths "their cars caused" <— it's just a tool, the person using the tool is responsible, go after him, and leave the rest of us alone, or we may take notice of you and come after you at the polls…take a look at the concealed carry/constitutional carry legislation that passed over the last 20 years…we are winning this battle for the Constitutional freedom of America.

  4. And yet, we have commercials that start with "If you are a loved one … " It's usually related to a drug approved by the FDA later to be found to cause harm. For big pharma, it's just the cost of doing business. In the meantime, your loved one is dead or seriously harmed. Guns are a problem? Don't think so.

  5. I am sick of this, It is a horrible tragedy that took place, senseless. But I promise if me or any family or friends get into a wreck with a DUI driver, we going to sue what ever car manufacturer that hits us and the manufacturer of the one we are driving for not keeping us safe from injury. and for selling the DUI drive the car that hit us.
    Smith & Wesson made a huge mistake settling in ther case. I know everyone has heard this before but here it is again. THE GUN DOESN'T KNOW RIGHT FROM WRONG, IT PERFORMED THE WAY IT WAS DESIGNED. The *UCKED UP PERSON BEHIND THE GUN DECIDED HOW IT WOULD BE USED.. AND THE DUMB A$$ POLICE CHIEF MADE A HORRIBLE DECISION. TEXAS HAS ONE OF THE BEST ACTIVE SHOOTER COURSES CALLED, ALERT. I GO THROUGH IT EVERY YEAR. THERE IS NO EXCUSE FOR THEM NOT GOING THROUGH IT BECAUSE THEY COME TO YOU!!!!!!!

    I am done bitching now!

  6. That’s the EQUIVALENT of suing…….. FORD…….. because THE DUI DRIVER…….. drove an F-150, when he left THE BAR, RAN A RED LIGHT, and killed FOUR PEOPLE in a TESLA………!!!!!!!!!! T-O-T-A-L BULLSH**……….!!!!!!!!!!

  7. This is like suing Chevrolet because the drunk driver that hit you was driving a Camaro.
    And all businesses should help fight this because the legal precedant it establishes is applicable should it become law.
    Daniel Defense should never ever settle.
    They did absolutely nothing wrong and complied with law .
    I would sue the police department for letting a nutcase with a history of being a nutcase get loose in their city and then playing on their phones as their children were shot and bled to death.

Leave a Reply