We compare the two most popular options for folding stock / brace options.
LAW Tactical gen 3 vs the Sylvan Arms gen 3 folding adapter.
This video is 100% unbiased and 100% our personal opinion just get the LAW folding adapter and ignore anyone who says the Sylvan Arms folder is somehow worth the money or better.
Just spend the extra money and get the LAW. Do yourself a favor. In our opinion.
_________________________________________
Music
Suitor – “I Can’t”
Suitor – “Wide Open”
Soundcloud:
Sylvan Arms adapter is actually kinda trash and poorly engineered. No torque specs, the castle nut isn’t stake-able. That little detent bearing is much harder than the metal of the adapter itself which leads to it quickly wearing a groove into the adapter and it no longer functioning as a detent.
No offense, this is a terrible review for these folders….. you can’t have guys with soft baby hands explaining gun stuff. And if you shoot the gun open for one you’re not gonna get a second round… and 2 it’s not safe for either one. If you wanna fire a gun with a folding stock get a piston driven gun
LMAO… You stooges have no clue. Just a couple of gun snobs . You people try to trash anything that's not overly priced. I have a sylvan folder and it's awesome.
ALL these folders are all potential gravediggers on an actual combat rifle.
I have one, and I know.
Fun on a range toy, or depending on your risk tolerance, possibly a truck gun, but when Cartel bullets begin to smack into your momma’s car door, I think you’ll want a conventional buffer tube.
You came for 0:18
Grow up.
dumb and dummer folding stock adventure
I love you guys for dropping the unsponsored opinion frame for 0.3 seconds
Just pause on :18 now go get your Law Tactical folder
The SA folder is junk. I bought one before I noticed that the castle nut is so tiny that I knew it might crack with the proper foot pounds applied. So I set my wrench for 30 and it still cracked.
You guys had too much fun making this video.
I just want to know what brand of Brew you were drinking during filming this😁👍
wasn't looking for a comedy show???
They are a pain when it come to cleaning ……. the spacer may get stuck when the o-ring dry out .. like mine did .
Bros thanks for the review, now I know I’m not buying a folding stock. Any brand.
You guys didn’t even compare them…. So thanks for this.. I guess.. onto an actual comparison.
I own both as seen in my picture. The Sylvan works, but the Law Tactical is the better folder. I’ve never hit my knuckle with the Sylvan charging a weapon. The Sylvan will launch the buffer and spring across the room if opened too aggressively and the buffer is oriented in a certain way. The law won’t. The only draw back to the law is that it can be over torqued to the receiver and won’t come off without some serious work(made a video about it). I simply added a QD end plate to my law or use the QD’s on the SBa3 since the one on the bottom isn’t practical. The law is the better product over all. You get what you pay for.
Not sure these guys should be handling firearms tbh.
Don't need a license to make an AR for personal use, at least up to June 2022. You do need one to become a manufacturer of AR's for sale.
I see you’re with your ghost guns lol
I’m liking and subscribing so you guys can buy a better camera! 😂 thanks for the video
A folding stock adapter for AR pistols? Really?
The SA version is junk. I had one on my build and in a class it failed on me multiple times, to the point I could get the failure to happen simply by smacking my stock. Maybe it was a lemon, maybe not, but is it worth the chance? Do yourself a favor and buy once, cry once. Get the LAW.
My SA has been replaced by a LAW 👍
Side charging will change the hand pinch between the CH and the folding adapter.