Home AR-15 Can the ATF regulate AR15 UPPERS? – Receiver definition change

Can the ATF regulate AR15 UPPERS? – Receiver definition change

1273
44

All Video Descriptions have been deleted as of 5/20/2021
My Odysee Channel has all the original content in the description there!

Support the channel:
.

PRE WORKOUT THAT WILL TURN YOU INTO A GORILLA – 10% off code: RENO –

GOLD TO THE MOON – BUY GOLD FROM YOUR OWN HOME – .
JOIN THE USCCA TO PROTECT YOURSELF AFTER THE GUNFIGHT:

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

44 COMMENTS

  1. I feel like people just sometimes like to run around yelling “the sky is falling!!”Uppers are not going to be “receivers”. The AR-15 is an already established design and the lower is the “frame”… If somebody came up with a substantially new design that was submitted to the AFT for approval THEN they would evaluate it and decide which part is the “frame” or “receiver” for the purposes of the regulations as it is applied to FFL and transfers. This does exactly zero for a home made firearm, or even the transfer of a home made firearm unless it is to a licensed FFL holder. As I read it, this wouldn’t even affect you dropping a home made weapon of to an FFL for work as that is not considers a “transfer”, of “possession” under the law. 🥴🤦🧐 Look I hate the BS we have to go through as much as the next, but people are acting like this applies to individuals and it doesn’t. The AFT has zero authority over your privately legally possessed firearms!! Stop giving them more power than they have.

  2. If the ATF just takes "firing mechanism" to mean the firing pin (which would be well within their regulatory authority to interpret the legislation as they chose to even if it contradicts the statute as per Cabais v. Egger), then they can get the upper to meet the two requirements of the Gun Control Act to be considered "the firearm": 1) that it house the hammer, bolt or breechblock (it houses the bolt and breechblock); and, 2) that it house the firing mechanism (i.e the firing pin which is within the bolt). The ATF can move to regulation of uppers instead of lowers. In fact, it's probably what they should have done all along to properly comply with the language of the GCA. BUT they would be opening a huge can of worms for themselves. Deregulating lowers would mean that full auto lowers are no longer NFA items. They could regulate full auto AR-15s by classing full auto BCGs as NFA items, but then they'd probably have to grandfather in millions of full auto BCGs in circulation, backlogging themselves in paperwork for a decade or two. The ATF is in a bind that only new legislation will fix.

  3. The problem I have with ATF rules changes is the fact the rulings can change retro actively like on Bump Stocks. Companies got a ruling on whether an item was "Legal" and 6 months later they say we changed our mind now they are ILLEGAL. Once something is approved by the ATF that should set a precedent at least for the items manufactured up to that point. People spent hundreds of dollars for Bump Stocks that came with a letter from ATF saying it was legal only to be told you now you must destroy your Bumpstock or go to Jail for 10 years. NO compensation. Europe considers the barrel the controlled registered part of a weapon. You could buy M-14 receivers or M1 Carbine receivers at gunshows no problem no paperwork.

  4. I have a question for anyone in California . I’m in ca and looking to get my first AR-15 and I’m leaning towards building my own. Would I be able to just buy a complete lower online and have them ship it to my local gun shop? If that’s the case I am just wondering if i would have to do anything else after the build.

  5. All they need to do is change a couple "and" words to "or" words in that definition and then they'll be serializing both halves of the receiver. The issue here is since there are several million uppers in circulation, how will they know the difference between an unserialized upper and a grandfathered upper? This seems unenforceable.

  6. In my opinion, lowers shoudnt be considered as a firearm because you can still use upper as a single shot. In Europe only regulated parts for instance on AK are bolt, barrel and front trunnion without these gun cannot fire.

  7. I’m a leftist and I was ready to join a few malicious in the fight against Donald Trump if he got a second presidency and/or stolen it. Which obvious now we all know he tried to do. But I’m In the area on the left that is very pro second amendment and this is at least one area were conservatives for lack of a better term and left us can agree on.

  8. They can try to ban whatever they want. I'll make 80% shotguns out of plywood, elmer's glue and lead pipes. Then I'll give them away to people, purely as an act of defiance. 🤣🤣 🖕 These traitors and their bold sense/illusion of power over Free Americans. The Brits tried it once. They tried to take our guns and we shot at them for 8 years straight. Now we have more people, more and better guns and far dumber overlords. Half of the other team doesn't even know which bathroom to use.

  9. I like to think that the record breaking firearm sales that Free Americans have been producing, is speaking volumes to the ATF and Fed. At the end of the day, I doubt they're coming for what we have. I do think that future purchases will become extremely difficult. Registration, multiple background checks, mental health evaluation, firearm insurance and a licence to own and then similar hoops to jump through with ammo purchases.

  10. i marinate my meat so its soft and tender , gov does the same to civilians . you see taking our guns that are actualy useful in defence is sort of softing us so we just melt in there mouth, easy to chew you see. back in in your pin good little sheep .

  11. There are millions upon millions of AR uppers that do not have serial numbers already on the market. Exactly what is that going to do to stop someone from printing out a lower receiver and throwing one of them uppers on there?

    Do they really believe that people are just going to volunteer to have serial numbers etched into their uppers, and register them with the government?

    It's almost like the government lives in a Fantasyland.

Leave a Reply