Home AR-15 Radical Firearms AR-15 Pistol Part 2: Reliability and How To Not Shoulder...

Radical Firearms AR-15 Pistol Part 2: Reliability and How To Not Shoulder An Arm Brace

844
25
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

25 COMMENTS

  1. I  have a 7.5 inch Diamondback pistol with the sig brace and have never after over 2000 round had one bit of any kind of problem. As for the sig brace or any arm brace if the SHTF you are not going to worry about it touching your shoulder. What I would do is put a flaming pig style can in place of the worthless muzzle brake because with the 7.5 inch barrel you will get one hell of a fireball and sound like no other 5.56 has ever made, but the flaming pig stops a LOT of that and makes it fun to shoot

  2. Get yourself a heavier buffer (Spike's T2 is recommended) and a backpressure muzzle device (NOT a brake!) such as the PWS CQB or Noveske KX3. Those devices mimic the backpressure that a suppressor creates and will give a huge boost to reliability of shorty ARs. A pigtail gas tube may also help if you can use one with your barrel.

  3. it's not anything like limp wristing a pistol, the recoil mechanism works in completely different ways. it's because the barrel pressure is too low and gas system is too friggen short. and it's right on the boarder line of not working at all. if I take the stock off a normal M4, and limp wrist it, it will shoot all day. I can't believe how much bad information so many of you self-proclaimed experts are feeding the unknown general public. people look up to you and others as knowledgeable role models, and believe some of this stuff like gospel. it really bugs me when it's a load of bs.

  4. If you can't solve the cycling problem by putting a carbine buffer n carbine buffer spring in it, try researching the proper size hole you need in your gas tube. IMHO an AR pistol barrel length should not be under 10.5".

  5. I thought it was the judicial branch that interpreted law, not the executive of which the atf is a part. Why do we subject ourselves to an unlawful interpretation provided by a branch of government who possesses no authority to do so? I guess it's a rhetorical question, but it still irritates me. You don't irritate Mr. Winkler, just the ruling class (as they see themselves). Thanks for the video. I'm interested how this pistol does long term.

Leave a Reply