Home AR-15 Pistol Brace AR-15's and the ATF

Pistol Brace AR-15's and the ATF

1637
24

For some gun owners, a pistol brace could be a life saver. Second Amendment supporters across America should know and understand the ATF stance on pistol braces, and why it’s so critical to keep fighting for your gun rights. Watch as NAGR Firearms Instructor Eric Jones explains the history of the pistol brace.
Like, Subscribe, Comment and share today!

Learn more about the fight for your Second Amendment rights by visiting:
You can also sign up to receive real-time state and national updates, by visiting

Follow NAGR on social media:
Facebook:
Twitter:
Instagram:

Made up of more than 4.5 million grassroots activists, the National Association for Gun Rights leads the charge to halt the radical gun-grabbing agenda running rampant across the nation. Accepting NO COMPROMISE on the issue of gun control, NAGR works tirelessly to hold politicians accountable for their anti-gun views and has made great strides in protecting and preserving the Second Amendment. But our effectiveness in the battle against these attacks on your liberties depend entirely on the support from pro-gun patriots like you.

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

24 COMMENTS

  1. They want you to limit points of contact with a gun that has a pistol brace. So basically people who know NOTHING about guns want you to make the gun less reliable and less CONTROLLABLE, which means a greater chance at error, which means greater chance of over-shooting your target and having less control over the recoil of your firearm, WHICH means that unintended targets could be hit. These people are morons if they think that's a good idea.

  2. I am going to be the only one with a common sense brain here. If you add a buttstock to a pistol, it becomes a short barreled rifle, and not a pistol. Just sayin. I don't give a damn what someone else calls it. If it has a buttstock attached it is a rifle of some kind, and no longer a pistol. Brace my ass.

    Now I also believe the AFT, FFL and all need to go, but a buttstock on a gun is a rifle. No need for any restrictions on any of them, and calling them something they are not does not change a damn thing. We still need PERMISSION to own any of them, so this all has to stop, but please,….. call them what they really are and get over this babying shit.

  3. The US Government has NO authority under the US Constitution to regulate firearms. The 2nd Amendment was written and designed specifically to restrict government from regulating the firearms of citizens. Any actions by the ATF to regulate firearms are unconstitutional.

    A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

    "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" !

  4. The government is Not sure if it’s legal to put my rifle on my shoulder while I safely target shoot paper targets . But it is legal and ok to take over a city set up an autonomous zone burn down police stations kick the police from the area , arm children set up boarders and shoot people randomly in an American city 🤔

  5. How could the ATF or any other LEO possibly enforce a “no shouldering” law for pistol brace AR’s? Also (and more importantly), would that law extend to the non-NFA “other” gun category we see in NJ and CT?

  6. Why blm and profa are out there saying defund the police they really should put the BATFE and DEA in their rant. Maybe the left will take on the task since they like to screech about their rights being infringed.

  7. The ATF is unconstitutional. The NFA is unconstitutional. Employers who have a, "No weapons" policy violate the constitution. Merchants that post, "Gun free zone" violate the constitution. All of these organizations should be liable for their unconstitutional actions.

Leave a Reply