Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.
During martial law you wouldn't be lawful to carry any fire arm because during the start of martial law there would be the "gun confiscation" so you are technically a unlawful citizen by carrying firearm
I have an extra lower with a ctr stock I keep around if shtf I'll swap lowers and rock and roll. At that point I don't care what the law is I'm using what I feel like using.
I share the same opinion on pistols vs SBRs. Plus it you want to sell a pistol you can do so immediately. If you want to sell an SBR to an individual you have to wait till their paperwork is approved.
An AR15 pistol with blade stabilizer IS a SBR….PERIOD…..and when you have to defend yourself are you going to NOT shoulder it? LAWS will NOT be in effect aside from the law of survival.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
I agree with what you said on the video … Good Job
I really don’t see any benefits over a SBR over a AR pistol, especially since we can shoulder a pistol brace now.
During martial law you wouldn't be lawful to carry any fire arm because during the start of martial law there would be the "gun confiscation" so you are technically a unlawful citizen by carrying firearm
I never thought of the idea of it falling under my CPL in a "semi shtf". That's a great point. Thumbs up and sub!
I have an extra lower with a ctr stock I keep around if shtf I'll swap lowers and rock and roll. At that point I don't care what the law is I'm using what I feel like using.
Nice pistol build
I share the same opinion on pistols vs SBRs. Plus it you want to sell a pistol you can do so immediately. If you want to sell an SBR to an individual you have to wait till their paperwork is approved.
An AR15 pistol with blade stabilizer IS a SBR….PERIOD…..and when you have to defend yourself are you going to NOT shoulder it? LAWS will NOT be in effect aside from the law of survival.
In SHTF is anyone gonna give a squat HOW you hold a gun? NOOOOOO……and…..FUCK NOOOOOO.
nice video. I have a pistol build in my crosshairs as we speak.