Thanks to Squarespace for sponsoring this channel!
If you’d like to start up your own website or online shop, visit Squarespace for a free trail and for 10% off your first purchase, go to
Nikon P1000
Video Shot with:
GH5
Panasonic Leica 25mm f/1.4
Laowa 7.5mm f/2
* I may earn a bit of commission if you use the product links above to help me keep on making videos for you, so thank you!
Music:
Blue Wednesday:
Dezaulait:
#Nikon #3000mm #Zooooooooooooooom
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.
Your voice doesn't fit with your looks
Whoever did this voiceover I want you to know that's messed up.
Slightly bigger then the one in your phone, that statement didn't age well.
A telephoto lens is for scared pervs. Real pervs use macro lenses.
Lol, "perverts."
Is that Dan? 5:14?
Made for me filming short videos of peregrine falcons perfect.
I think its sad that when i want to shoot wildlife or the moon (or a bikini girl in the next city) I have to put down my EOS with an expensive lens and pick up my OLD Lumix bridge with a 1200mm zoom and the whole thing has to weigh more than half a pound. I dont understand why this lens cant be used on a Full camera for a descent price. Whats up with that $13,000 canon that is only 600mm? WTF? Ithink that makes my lumix and your coolpix (what a name) worth at least $25,000. What say you?
I have the P900, It is a decent camera for wildlife, especially if you are just trying to document what you find and not expecting National Geographic quality.
Imma stick to my Sigma 150-500mm +2x teleconverter on a Canon 70D.
its a bridge between camera and telescope LOL
This camera is ideal as a spotting scope for long range shooters- reaching longer than any other.
A huge zoom lens with an image sensor the size of your pinky finger nail.
My first serious camera was a Bridge Camera fairly much like this one. It had a 24-1000mm FX equivalent zoom.
I actually disagree with the notion that these cameras have little purpose. Sure, I don't ever use it anymore now, (currently have a Nikon D7500 with 3 lenses), but I've never regretted starting out with the Fujifilm bridge cam (I think it was HS50 EXR).
As a starting photographer it allowed me to test out basically every aspect of capturing images that I wanted, so that I could figure out what had my interest most. Did I prefer shooting wide shots, or more zoomed in, for portraits, maybe tele photos would be my thing, for birds etc. And indeed, many pictures of the moon, and also of Jupiter and Saturn, and the Sun (with proper filter). It allowed me to test the water for astrophotography, by now I have a pretty good telescope for that, but many of the techniques I first applied with that bridge camera, I can still apply with the telescope.
Having full control over ISO, shutter time, and aperature, I learned the basics photography. I started out on automatic mode, then switched to the scene modes, and by the end of me using it, I only shot in manual mode anymore. I got to try out infrared photography (bought an infra red filter), I tried out long exposures at day time (10 stop ND filter), tried out a polarizer (filter obviously). The camera could also film, also in high speed. Had fun with that.
Sure, the image quality was poor, ISO above 200 was kind of unusable. But it sure was a versitile little thing. (Oh, I made sure to have manual zoom and a focus ring on it, cause I wanted to work with that).
So, in short, it was the bridge for me from point-and-shoot, to proper photography.
lol its a bridge camer because it makes a bridge when extended
Im here in Australia, its probably the same with other places in the world but we have some rare exotic birds and in general most people will appreciate if you get a out of focus shot of some of these birds, so have a good enough photo up close of these birds because yes they do fly off so its hard to get close, the camera is a gamer changer. How do I know?? Well I don't, I only just ordered this camera so im bias haha
I want a p1000 so bad,,,I have other cameras,,with super zoom lens
Chapstick, Carmex, Bee Balm.
if you consider the dramtic loss in quality of the p1000, you just need a 150-600+ converter on your dslr…
I got this camera for taking footage of long range rifle matches. For this purpose it's doing a fine job. The picture quality isn't that good, but it's good enough. It's definitely a niche camera, but for that one niche, it's good value.
“That’s a really nice shot of my toothbrush”
So sad, I’d not watched you since the CCP destroyed HK.
5:40 at 3000mm and F/8 looks cool, but why the 1/640s ISO 1600, does the moon move that fast at 3000mm? xD
I love how he is reviewing this Flagship Nikon Coolpix P1000 as if it's a ripoff how bad product
P stands for pervert
I used this camera in a camera store, it recorded heat haze even with i the haze. Image quality is a disaster
Ultimate perv camera