On Tuesday, April 2, CRPA, with the support of NRA, filed a comprehensive opposition to California’s request seeking an immediate stay of enforcement of Friday’s decision in the case of Duncan v. Becerra, which found California’s restrictions against so-called “large-capacity” magazines unconstitutional and unenforceable.
This is the second opposition filed in response to California’s request for a stay. As reported yesterday, DOJ filed a request seeking an immediate stay while the court considered an additional request to stay the judgment while the case gets appealed.
The opposition illustrates how California has not shown a strong likelihood that it will succeed on the merits of its case, or that any of the other factors courts consider when deciding to issue a stay weigh in California’s favor. Palmetto State Armory also provided evidence to counter California’s arguments requesting a stay.
Stay Up-To-Date on the Latest Developments in Duncan v. Becerra
At this time, the Court has yet to issuing a ruling on California’s request to stay the enforcement of its judgment pending appeal. It is critical that California gun owners stay up-to-date on developments in Duncan to ensure they do not inadvertently violate California law should a stay be issued.
You can also view a list of commonly asked questions with answers regarding the ruling in Duncan at HERE.
Continue to check your inbox and the California Stand and Fight webpage for updates on this issue and other issues impacting your Second Amendment rights and hunting heritage in California.
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.
Source link
