Redfield Revenge Review & comparison to Nikon Prostaff

Thanks for your opinion on these scopes. 4 years on, have you changed your mind?

how about, aim dead center of the brisket and shoot the deer. you dont need hold over at 50, 100, 200 yds etc.

no comparison…….you dont need all thatvrange finding, bdc crap

No way an Albertan Mule dear back to brisket is 16". The doe I shot last year was 21". Lol. And the Bucks, we'll never measured one, but just a touch more. Would work great for white tail though.

Typical Yank Wank refer to firearms as weapons. Define WEAPON stupid, Something used to engage in a BATTLE ??????????????????????

Whoa, hold it.
You are not being at all fair in comparing these two scopes. You are comparing apples to oranges here.
The Redfield has, apparently, BDC type reticle and the Nikon model you chose does not,.so that should end this biased review right there
. My Prostaff with BDC does have similar turrets to your Redfield, and before you say anything about this, my Nikon was bought in 2008, so these turrets have been on Nikon since at least then.
Redfield scopes have been a part of the Leupold Company since about 2008 ..and as such ( and even before this date ) they have been fine scopes and deserve a more fair comparison.
The main point I am trying to make here is to be fair when making these reviews and when two or more products are to be compared to one an other, then it would be better to have similar products sitting side by side in features and benefits.

Bloody cat, I hate cats!

this guy is a dope making dizzy with all the zoom in and out

Great review, thanks.

You cat appears to be very interested in scope reviews lol.

Do you use just any bullet and zero to 200 yards and the scope will take over with the various distances??

lol..

This guy shouldn't be doing reviews on rifle scopes.Half the time he doesn't know what hes talking about.

This guy obviously doesn't know what he's talking about. Range finders only work at 400 on deer? Ridiculous

I have a old tasco 3×12  40mm which also adjusted the bullet drop compansation the same way. Redfield is not the first to offer that option. Thank you for your review which I enjoyed and decided to go with the Redfield now. I do own 4 of the prostaffs already and to be honest, I love them. Thanks again 

if you would have done your research you would find that redfield has 91% light transmission and nikon has 98% light transmission therefore your statement is incorrect

This is a very unfair comparision btwn a new line of scopes from refield the revenge series vs nikons really old 1st gen prostaff you can't even buy anymore, newsflash current gen nikon prostaffs have zero reset turrets, i had bought myself a redfield revenge and regretted it, blurry hazy cloudy is what i can say about it, and it hissed it's nitrogen out at when i hand zoomed it to max power i was like wtf that was the last straw screw the warranty im taking it back, and back i went to trade for nikons current gen prostaff way brighter way more clear throughout it's zoom range, dont believe go buy yourself one and then try a nikon prostaff in person mounted on a any rifle, this is a very poor representation of these two scopes

Do you always need the scope at max zoom for the bdc to work on the redfield?

This is the best video I've seen explaining the range-finding system of the red field revenge. Thank you!

Nice review. I ended up with the Revenge 3-9×40 accu-ranger which will be residing on a Ruger American.  Seems like a great match. 

You are talking about the revolution, not the revenge.

FOr the nikon is it normal for the cross hairs not to move? I dont know much about scopes I know I sould like an idiot but I can use your help. Thanks man

…the Revenge is 50 dollars more than the Nikon. The new Prostaff lets 98% light in too! I am really diggin the ballistic range finder on the revenge though. Still, I think with the new turrets and improved light for the price I might go with the Nikon. They must have seen you call their coin adjusted turrets stupid…LOL Thanks for the review.

I purchased mine when the first came out and it has right on it "made in USA" so maybe later models are made in phillipines.

redfied is made in the states

Where did you get the bipods?

revenge parts made in usa, assembled in phillipines, marked right on body

I've heard that leuapold bought out Redfield.

No they are not, look it up, some of them are made overseas.

Not true the revenge is made in the Philippines and the revolution is made in Oregon

All redfield scopes are made in Oregon USA.

redfield revenge is made in Oregon

good review mate, how do the turrets on the revenge work for dialing/ ressetting etc?

I have the redfield but mine is the 4 x 12 by 40 and it is amazing for the money and I love the accu range it's like a range finder and a scope in one

damn it i just bought the nikon. With i would have seen this vid before.

Nice review. Just bought a Remington Sendero SF II chambered in 7mm rem mag. Was looking at purchasing the Burris Fullfield 6.5-20x50mm with the ballistic mil-dot reticle. Now you have me interested in the Redfield Revenge 6-18x44mm scope with the Accu-Ranger Varmint reticle. The Redfield is less money too. Will have to try and do some serious comparison decisions on this one! What do you think?

Just bought mine in the 3×9…cant wait to try it out. Thanks for the review!

redfield is made in USA last time I read their website.