Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.
I always believe that a true DI system should have no sealing component at the end of the gas tube. Modern day so-called DI is either AR15's unique internal piston or a hybrid system like the Chinese HMGs or the Perun X16
This is why Forgotten Weapons is so great. Telling the back stroy on the weapon and showing the internal mechanisms. Its one thing to tell me a gun is cool or complex but showing is so much better. Showing how it works and why will always be the best. No one does it better than Ian
In mechanical applications, a piston can be described as the part that is acted upon and which does the power stroke. Like in an internal combustion engine, where the combustion acts upon the pistion and drives it down to move the crankshaft. If we compare that to firearms, let's say an AK47- we see the same. A piston being acted upon by the gasses and being pushed back. Instead of conrods and a crankshaft, it is of course connected to the bolt carrier.
In the AR10/15 design, there technically is no piston. The bolt is not acted upon and pushed back- it is merely a sealing surface for the gasses. If anything, it would be the carrier that could be the piston, as that is the part being acted upon and then drawing the bolt along with it. However, since the gasses directly act upon the bolt carrier (one may call it a direct impingeing force on the bolt carrier) it should be considered a "direct gas impingement" system, in my opinion.
Just because the gasses are directed inside the carier and "hit" the bolt and carrier, I don't think it should be called "piston operated".
i dont think hybrd or Piston is accurate either. the,,"piston system is more for timing than the operation of the rifle. the BCG is still beimg moved directly by gas.
The presence of gas rings on the bolt really seems to trip people up. This "piston" is no different than the enlarged end of the gas tubes on the Ljungman or MAS 44. It doesn't do anything itself to drive the carrier, but acts as a more efficient seal while the gas pushes against the carrier. It's only a quarter-step away from those basic direct impingement systems, as far as I'm concerned.
IT ISA DIRECT IMPINGEMENT firearm, you just said it yourself, The gas enters the bolt carrier and pushes it back, to function the weapon. That's it, nothing more. You can say what the bolt does, but that's because the carrier is moving rearward BECAUSE OF THE DIRECT IMPINGEMENT.
Could you really count that « piston » as contributing to the action? I’m pretty sure the gun would still cycle if you plugged the hole leading to the bolt and just kept the cup. It seems like it’s just there to reduce the friction the bolt and locking lugs.
How would you feel if i was to call a real direct impringement system a "zero length long stroke has piston system"? As far as i can tell, they are essentially the same thing, with the only difference being where the gas tube ends and the bolt carrier begins.
These explanations of how guns really work is something no one does as well as "forgotten weapons " It's really not a gun channel but a engineering and history channel
Ian's description makes the bolt sound more like a cam lug than a piston. Overall the operating system seems like a modified DI operation. In the grand scheme of things this is a pointless debate.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalit...
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
So, may we call that a bullpup gas operation, as the gas chamber is relocated behind the barrel, or is it not backward enough ?
This has been very helpful, thanks
gas is impinging directly on the bolt. otherwise there wouldn't be any need for sealing rings on it
I always believe that a true DI system should have no sealing component at the end of the gas tube. Modern day so-called DI is either AR15's unique internal piston or a hybrid system like the Chinese HMGs or the Perun X16
This is why Forgotten Weapons is so great. Telling the back stroy on the weapon and showing the internal mechanisms. Its one thing to tell me a gun is cool or complex but showing is so much better. Showing how it works and why will always be the best. No one does it better than Ian
I want to see the whole rifle shown here. Looks like a really early example
Man the AK people are gonna be really mad when they find out that the AR is technically a long stroke gas piston system
That thumbnail looks wrong.
Simple.
I disagree.
In mechanical applications, a piston can be described as the part that is acted upon and which does the power stroke.
Like in an internal combustion engine, where the combustion acts upon the pistion and drives it down to move the crankshaft.
If we compare that to firearms, let's say an AK47- we see the same. A piston being acted upon by the gasses and being pushed back. Instead of conrods and a crankshaft, it is of course connected to the bolt carrier.
In the AR10/15 design, there technically is no piston. The bolt is not acted upon and pushed back- it is merely a sealing surface for the gasses. If anything, it would be the carrier that could be the piston, as that is the part being acted upon and then drawing the bolt along with it.
However, since the gasses directly act upon the bolt carrier (one may call it a direct impingeing force on the bolt carrier) it should be considered a "direct gas impingement" system, in my opinion.
Just because the gasses are directed inside the carier and "hit" the bolt and carrier, I don't think it should be called "piston operated".
Y tho
i dont think hybrd or Piston is accurate either. the,,"piston system is more for timing than the operation of the rifle. the BCG is still beimg moved directly by gas.
The presence of gas rings on the bolt really seems to trip people up. This "piston" is no different than the enlarged end of the gas tubes on the Ljungman or MAS 44. It doesn't do anything itself to drive the carrier, but acts as a more efficient seal while the gas pushes against the carrier. It's only a quarter-step away from those basic direct impingement systems, as far as I'm concerned.
IT ISA DIRECT IMPINGEMENT firearm, you just said it yourself, The gas enters the bolt carrier and pushes it back, to function the weapon. That's it, nothing more. You can say what the bolt does, but that's because the carrier is moving rearward BECAUSE OF THE DIRECT IMPINGEMENT.
Bloke on the Range is typing…
So, youre telling me the gas impinges on the bolt…directly?
Sure looks like direct impingement to me !
One of the least forgotten weapons of all time
Then can you give us an example of direct impingement?
Could you really count that « piston » as contributing to the action?
I’m pretty sure the gun would still cycle if you plugged the hole leading to the bolt and just kept the cup.
It seems like it’s just there to reduce the friction the bolt and locking lugs.
How would you feel if i was to call a real direct impringement system a "zero length long stroke has piston system"? As far as i can tell, they are essentially the same thing, with the only difference being where the gas tube ends and the bolt carrier begins.
I'm trying to figure out what all that TAPE is about! I get the operating system it just works Stoner was a genius designer just a bad businessman!
Puff puff pass mufu

These explanations of how guns really work is something no one does as well as "forgotten weapons "
It's really not a gun channel but a engineering and history channel
i understood everything
Stoners arent gonna know!




Ian's description makes the bolt sound more like a cam lug than a piston. Overall the operating system seems like a modified DI operation. In the grand scheme of things this is a pointless debate.
You let them know Ian. No direct impingement here
You're telling me a Stoner designed this system?
Very fascinating.
First