Home AR-15 Kamala Says AR-15 Ban Is Consistent With Second Amendment

Kamala Says AR-15 Ban Is Consistent With Second Amendment

137
39

Go to to stay fully informed on 2A news and get all sides of every story. Subscribe for 40% off unlimited access through my link.

Kamala Harris finally did her first post-debate interview and got asked preverbal softball questions about GUNS and to expound on her saying she was a gun owner during the debate.

Harris responded with “I am a gun owner and Tim Walz, my running mate, is also a gun owner. We’re not taking anyone’s guns away. I support the Second Amendment and I support reasonable gun safety laws,” Harris said.

“I feel very strongly that it is consistent with the Second Amendment and your right to own a gun to also say we need an assault weapons ban. They’re literally tools of war,” Harris continued. “I say we need universal background checks. The majority of NRA members support that. Why? It’s just reasonable. You just might want to know.”

What she didn’t mention is that all of these United States government agencies who are not at war have these types of rifles, but somehow when they’re in the hands of Citizens, they magically morph into “Tools of WAR” designed “to kill a lot of people quickly.”

Now don’t think for one second that the irony is lost on me that Kamala began by saying she supports the Second Amendent and then the very next thing out of her mouth is proposing a law that literally violates the Second Amendment.

Kamala Harris doesn’t get to decide what does and doesn’t violate the Second Amendment any more than when she was a prosecutor having a criminal tell her which of their criminal actions does and doesn’t violate the law.

That’s not how the constitution works.

Also, Click HERE for my favorite in-ear totally wireless hearing protection That has 6x hearing enhancement, 10 hours of use, and they’re easy to use:
➡️

NEW Need Money For Pew Pew Design

Need Money For Guns
➡️

Portable Gun Safes
➡️

Let me know your thoughts in the comments!

📲 Subscribe to @ColionNoir Here:

➡️ Join Our 2A Membership Club here on YOUTUBE and get these perks:

➡️ Join MY Exclusive 2A Advocacy Text List while AUTOMATICALLY being entered in our monthly 2A Giveaways

➡️ Get UnApologetically 2A Content In Short-Form On YouTube & Help Protect The Second Amendment

➡️ FREE BOOK – If I Only Had One Concealed Carry

Looking to help further our Pro Constitution, Pro 2A message, donate below:

UnApologetically 2A Content Content On Other Platforms:
Twitter –
Instagram –
Facebook –
Gab –
Truth Social-
Youtube Shorts –

#GunControl SecondAmendment #GunRights #KamalaHarris

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

39 COMMENTS

  1. I really just want to see a politician in a national debate shut this "assault weapons" bit down immediately and state that the AR-15 is a standard semi automatic rifle that uses the same technology as all handguns and most rifles. Why do republicans never make that point?

  2. Yea… guns of war, that is EXACTLY what the people are supposed to be able to have. The right of the PEOPLE to have weapons shall not be infringed. If there is ever a war, don't you think having the citizens of these United States, able to step up and defend this country is EXACTLY what the founding fathers intended?

  3. Since assault weapons cannot be definitively determined; therefore they do not exist. Hence forth, no rule of law can be enforced. There is no such thing as an "assault weapon". It’s a common term like coke. (What flavor of "coke" do you want?)

  4. She’s showing us how little she knows about the Constitution! The second amendment is the most simple amendment …. The Right to bear arms shall not be infringed! Definitely she’s a incompetent candidate who is way over her head. Just hearing her try to answer questions is unbearable.

  5. Well regulated,,,means haveing modern weapons ready to deal with modern times, it would not make sence that it means we only have basic guns fr back in the day,, how is that in any way shape or form,, well regulated

  6. Thanks for the video.

    This particular one used a lot more words and time than seemed necessary. A bit ‘rambly’ and less coherent.

    Anyhow, I DO know it can be quite labor some to produce this stuff regularly. I hope this can be received constructively.

  7. "I feel very strongly that it is consistent with the Second Amendment and your right to own a gun to also say we need an assault weapons ban." As if her very strong feelings meant anything when it comes to a constitutionally protected, basic individual right.

  8. Harris is an airhead who keeps repeating the same crap. AR-15s aren't used by the military. The M-16 and M-14 are used. The difference: An AR-15 only has semi-automatic fire. An M-16/M-14 both have selective fire allowing for automatic fire.
    Furthermore, while the AR-15 has never been used by the military, pistols, long rifles, and shotguns have been used. So will they also ban those, since they are "weapons of war?" Anybody who believes they will stop at one type of armament is delusional.

  9. RESOLVED, That a well-regulated militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defense of a free state; that standing armies, in time of peace, should be avoided as dangerous to liberty; and that in all cases the military should be under strict subordination to, and governed by, the civil power.

    – Virginia Declaration of Rights (Section 13), June 1776

Leave a Reply