AR15+Semi Automatic Crisis: Largest Gun Ban in History Potentially? Supreme Court Garland v Cargil

If you don't think the government will throw a shoe string in your safe to add another charge then you're still sleeping!!!

The NFA (1934) is clearly a violation of the 2nd Amendment.

The Deep State is aimed at the general population to take away your ability to defend yourself, when the millions of illegals are sanctioned to control us.

Molon Labe!

A bump fire stock doesn't accelerate the function of a trigger. It does assist the person firing the weapon sustain a fast and steady rhythm pulling the trigger.

I think we also need to consider the subtext of this decision in regards to the other cases. Now keep in mind I'm progun but there's an echo chamber that occurs in 2A-spheres and I want to share my thoughts.

Starting with who signed the original order to ban bump stocks. Mathew Whitaker a progun Iowa lawyer and Trump loyalist. Why would a man like this go against an anti gun Dianne Feinstein aka the woman who wrote FAWB?

Well that's simple, there is a concerted corporate push to upend federal agencies ability to regulate especially environmentally unless the regulations are spelled out by Congress. Hence the Loper Bright and Relentless cases.

This push, included delaying/stacking the supreme court and an influence peddling campaign to the already on the bench conservative justices. These trifecta of decisions could completely gut regulations back to pre-1996 Congressional Review Act.

There's a real possibility that this case is used to disenfranchise the citizens rights to clean water and air. Eventually political winds will change but in the meantime regulations are ignored and record profits are made. When the winds change, the Neolibs/Neocons come to a compromise and confiscate all firearms because we as a people are too sick to fight off confiscation. Because corporations and oligarchies don't like armed and organized citizens. Sure it sounds like a movie script but it's a very real possibility and we only get to tell our side once. The Pinkertons are very much alive and want a repeat of the aftermath of The Homestead Strike of 1892… And not The Battle of Blair Mountain.

I see it clearly now. All of our clothing, curtain pulls, couches, sleeping bags, dog beds, shoes, hat bands and bead bracelets are machine guns, since they have cord involved. It makes perfect sense.

The users arm is the second function

2A

People for whom the phrase 'shall not be infringed' is in any way not completely unambiguous should not be in the position to pass or enforce laws. not

Assault shoe laces… lol
OMG , Jerry Michlik is a machine gun.

Remember when online FUDDs screamed the conservative supreme court would save us?

Pepperidge Farms remembers.

Why is the Supreme Court getting involved in the mechanical details of a firearm?! A Supreme Court judge should scrap the NFA and everything thereafter that “regulates”!!! Instead of us watching this unconstitutional side-show we need to make our voices heard that treason is being committed and that all public servants will be tried for it.

JaegerZ999 been real quiet since this dropped…

After listening to that again it sounds like Thomas knows exactly what he’s talking about and he’s trying to press the government on admitting that the trigger function is essentially unchanged.

Why are liberals always whining about mass shootings at schools? Kids are bad these days anyway

An attempt to ban semi automatics will be a red line. If successful then one might as well add that third pin because it won't matter. 5,600 a f t agents vs 20 plus million rifle owners guess who will win?

The objective of the gun control agenda to me is crystal clear. And that is to turn the American gun laws into a replica of Great Britain and Australia where they can perform a massive confiscation of most firearms via mandatory buybacks, rigorous licensing and restrictions for guns that remain which will be much less, and strip away the right to self protection that the 2nd amendment guarantees so criminals can have free reign like the do in England and Australia in the name of socialism.

Why is this even a discussion? Why does tax dollars pay for old rich people to argue semantics. The definition of a "machine gun" is fine the way it is.

The supreme court and lawyers shouldnt be arguant about semantics on innanimate object but actually upholding laws including and most desperately the fact that none the current president or administration thinks there is such a thing as illegal immigration.or the fact the presidents son isnt in jail for posetion of an illegal weapon and highly illegal drugs.

F-ing clown world. No wonder the world that used to respect us literally laughs at us. Im so tired of this drival.

Well hell if they’re just gonna make everyone a felon why not just go mask off and make an sbs

Gun grabbers watch YouTube to get ideas. I don't see your helping gun owners by offering professional advice regarding hypothetical arguments that you suggest are conspiracy worthy to the general public. To the contrary you're suggesting "novel" legal arguments to the gun grabbers.

Nobody is ever taking our rifles! Unless you’re living in California

sooo holding a gun loosley and letting the gun flyaround in your hands…(bump stock) causes it to a be machine gun?? That AFT/Person talking to the judge is LYING to the judge about the trigger.

Treaty is law.
UN treaty requires disarming.
UN required open borders.
UN required vaccine
See a pattern

That'd be nice if the scotus ruled the NFA unconstitutional

Everything the Left pushes sounds like religious dogma. They believe or feel all of they're talking points. Remove machine guns, free speech or illegal immigration or whatever Progressive are pushing and say instead "What is Sin"? Now their arguments sound like dogmatic rhetoric that only true believers can understand and support.

Where are the people on our side? Where are the arguments? Why are they not showing demonstrating to the Supreme Court how it actually works? Seems pretty simple to me. Show them how a machine gun works. Show them how a bop works. What’s the problem? I’m not understanding these ladies and gentlemen are certainly smart enough to understand a real demonstration. It would be glaringly obvious the difference.

If so, we are one Supreme Court ruling away from Civil War Two.

The 2nd Amendment is a God given right. No politician or court has any jurisdiction. It doesn’t matter what they say.

🤗 JESUS JESUS JESUS WHAT A BEAUTIFUL NAME ❣️🕊️

Doesn't the release of the sear for each round fired by the motion of the trigger make it a semiautomatic? Does a machine gun engage the sear between the diring between each round fired?

the 2nd amendment was designed to prevent the use of organized crime by the government in power to target political enemies removal of 2a is the ultimate destruction of protecting political assembly.

We need the Jerry Miculek gene added to the human race and we won't need full auto.

Not to brag but I wore two shoe laces today.

That was a great Aladdin quote

I CAN SLAM FIRE A PUMP SHOTGUN SIX SHOTS IN TWO SECONDS IS THAT ACTION A MACHIN GUN SO NOW ARE THEY GOING TO BAN PUMP SHOTGUNS TO