Home EOTech Eotech 512.A65 and Mepro 21 12MOA

Eotech 512.A65 and Mepro 21 12MOA

262
14

Eotech 512.A65 and Mepro 21 12MOA triangle

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

14 COMMENTS

  1. Gee, this is old video. Sold both and got ITL MARS, then sold it too. Of all three, I prefer EOTech, seconed closely by MARS and Mepro trailing far behind. EOTech has best reticle for fast shooting, as well as precision dot if you need accuracy. MARS is very good but dot is sometimes too small for fast acquisition. Mepro is too dark for anything but daylight, also has problem when aiming from shadows to bright light (reticle is too dim).

  2. @stevenxowens792 The M21 is the issue sight for the IDF. If you do an image search for IDF soldiers, you will see photos of M21s that have no finish left and are battered that are still in use.

  3. @andromedarr At very close ranges, you will experience parallax on any reflex sight. At very close ranges the Parallax is not detrimental (a 1/4" change in point of impact at 5 meters will not hurt). They are parallax free at anything other than very close range. If the curtains were at 15 or 20 meters from the sights, you would not see the parallax. If you contact me I can explain parallax to you.

  4. @andromedarr All holosights have parallax. Parallax-free is a marketing term. The trick is to build the sight so that the parallax appears at very close ranges, and longer ranges are parallax-free. At 15 meters, parallax will not cause a significant change in point of impact, while at 150 meters it would. At a few feet, parallax will be noticeable in any optic that cannot be adjusted for the range.
    The parallax you see in both of those sights is due to the very short range to the curtain.

Leave a Reply