Home AR-15 California AR-15 Ban Ruled Unconstitutional By Famous Federal Judge

California AR-15 Ban Ruled Unconstitutional By Famous Federal Judge

954
47

πŸ“² Subscribe to @ColionNoir Here:

New Release!! Embroidered Premium Hoodies
➑️

A federal judge has ruled that a California law prohibiting assault weapons is unconstitutional. The law, which was established in 1989 and targeted semi-automatic weapons, was found to be incompatible with a recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that strengthened gun rights.

U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez, based in San Diego, made this ruling in response to a legal challenge presented by gun rights organizations and various stakeholders. The judge argued that the law unjustly stripped law-abiding citizens of their access to semi-automatic firearms such as the AR-15, thereby infringing upon their Second Amendment rights, which protect the “right to keep and bear arms” according to the U.S. Constitution.

2nd Amendment In Shape Of Rifle (AR-15s are Protected by the 2nd Amendment Merchandise)
➑️

Shop The Best Pro 2A Conversation Starter Merch:
➑️

Join Our 2A Membership Club here on YOUTUBE and get these perks:
➑️

Join MY Exclusive 2A Advocacy Text List while AUTOMATICALLY being entered in our monthly 2A Giveaways
➑️

Let’s Go Brandon Merchandise
➑️

Get UnApologetically 2A Content In Short-Form On YouTube & Help Protect The Second Amendment
➑️

FREE BOOK – If I Only Had One Concealed Carry
➑️

PRO 2A Message Hats In Trucker, Dad, Snapback & More
➑️

Looking to help further our Pro Constitution, Pro 2A message, donate below:

UnApologetically 2A Content Content On Other Platforms:
Twitter –
Instagram –
Facebook –
Gab –
Truth Social-
Youtube Shorts –

#2ANews #ColionNoir #DefensiveGunUse

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

47 COMMENTS

  1. Note that Arms also includes bladed weapons… less popular, but California has some knife bans on the books which also need to go away.

    On this issue – the 2nd – California has a couple of massive cities, and major high density suburbs, and more than a century of politicians and others immigrating from Back East who deliberately set about copying the failed policies they left behind. Second & third generations born here into such families, and/or indoctrinated in the public schools, makes life difficult for freedom loving people who do not want to be overly reliant / controlled by Big Government

  2. I wish you would refer to "assault weapons" in italics or as "so-called assault weapons". It's clear those who hate the Constitution, especially the 2nd Amendment, and seeking to disarm law-abiding, legal gun owners love this meaningless and conjured term meant solely to elicit an emotional and erroneous response of uneducated citizens owning AR-15s and bent upo0n destruction of a peaceful society. Newson and Illinois' Prickster see themselves at the top of the socialist heap capriciously creating unconstitutional law "for thee but not for me".

  3. First, big fan enjoy your content. Even bought merch. I even joined uscca bc of you. But recently learned they were sued for not covering a person. They use a caveat to get out of it. I called them and they confirmed, and with the corrupt das and courts, you run the risk of no representation

  4. So here's a thing people don't realize for a judge to make any type of ruling on firearms. Yes unconstitutional because the judge is the government as well. And does not have the authority to regulate firearms good or bad.

  5. Funny how California is all about stalling the rights of 2a community! For those who say why do you need more than 10 rounds, I say when was the last time criminals "ONLY " EVER DO THIER DEEDS SOLEY ? so if rainbows and unicorns could fly out of newsoms ass we would only need 10 rounds because the criminals would only have 10 as well UNLESS THEY HAVE A COUPLE OF BUDDIES ALONG FOR THE RIDE !!!! So you see being well armed means you have enough firepower to PROTECT yourself !!!!

  6. As a veteran, ANY government that seeks to strip the people of their RIGHT to protect themselves, is a tyrannical government. You don't have to agree with the 2A, but it gives you no right to infringe upon it, or violate your oath of office.

  7. My question is; what is the penalty for doing these things. Trying to break our constitutional rights, when they should be asking the judges before hand if it’s ok.
    They basically break the law over and over and get rich doing it, with zero accountability. Sad.

  8. California is never gonna change. No matter what 2A friendly law passes, the tyrannical powers will always find a work around. They been doing it for so long. Case in point, Oh you have to allow more CCW permits. Okay, well we will just make it so CCW holders have so many ''Sensitive'' areas, that carrying would be pointless. The best option is just to move out of the state. California is one of the worst states to live in general, not just for gun owners.

  9. what's clear as day….."Shall NOT be Infringed"…. I don't understand why politicians and judges (and Democrats) choose to ignore the plain text that limits government intrusions upon We the People.

  10. NY state is doing background checks on ammo. Deer hunters are upset because if you do one background check on one type of ammo if you buy 3 different sizes it's 3 different checks. The lines in stores are backed up and take hours .
    My local farm store just pulled it all off shelf's

  11. I hope the 9th circus does what they do and overrules this. And then I hope it goes up to SCOTUS. This needs to go nation wide. Even after Bruen, citizens of New York are still living with the reality that things got worse, including our AWB.

  12. I live in wa state this is second time he has did this why hasn't superior court taken this?we who live in 9th district have been waiting as our state just got a huge blow in July and before that on mags,2a forever

Leave a Reply