ATF Faces Immediate Nationwide Block of Pistol Brace & Short Barreled Rifle Rule!!!

🇺🇸 Support the Channel🇺🇸
Join USCCA http://usccapartners.com/armedscholar
BlackoutCoffee: https://www.blackoutcoffee.com/armedscholar
Code: "ArmedScholar" for 10% Off

I don’t understand how the ATF can ban braces but allow bump stocks

So umm is pistol brace legal now?

If pistol braced firearms are SBR’s, that would mean there are up to 40 million not including the existing SBR’s currently registered. That means there are no longer unusual. And to be registered under the NFA it has to be both, dangerous and unusual, not one or the other. Thus, it no longer falls under the definition which makes it fall under the NFA.

good morning
wish organization will protect me for the pistol brace band

we are soo fukked, it gets worse everyday

Why is it that we are going through the court system when only congress can make decisions on firearms and or class three weapons?
Its like asking a fireman to arrest someone.

If by dangerous they mean more accurate to aim then yes. If by unusual and uncommon they mean 4-9 million of them in America then yes.

Dude your movements are distracting to your words. Take some on camera lessons to professionalize that nice set you have. Watch and you will see growth of you follow my advice.

Oh I'm tired of this BS! What's next? Oh, since we don't consider ammunition a firearm, it's a firearm accessory, it's not protected under 2A. I hate these evil people that twist words to infringe on our rights that NO courts have any damn right to rule on taking away. Our rights are not up for negotiations.

Thanks for keeping the public updated on these cases.

This is ridiculous especially the magazine band or capacity band it makes no sense I just missed a great sale on a $299 Rock 5.7 gun even if they're garbage who cares for 299 even if it worked for a year I'd be happy but they had no 10 round magazines or any compatible ones that I can get from a neighboring state that does not have the band makes no sense I can carry as many magazines on my person and as many handguns as I like I can also possess magazines that are above the mag band limit I just cannot buy or sell them and my state makes no sense it is literally a 45-minute drive to the nearest gun shop across the state line to load up on whatever I need it's more of a headache but it's a fun ride just makes no sense so a criminal that has a 10 round I mean a 33 round magazine in his clock plus one or 30 rounds whatever they are I picked one up but never used it or counted how many rounds it takes because it's clear and looks ridiculous but what chance does a regular law abiding citizen that's just carrying a gun for safety of him and his family and is not into guns like that and doesn't think to bring extra magazines because he doesn't think that he might not need them taking mine usually people like this rolling pack so take that magazine and multiply it times five people so usually when I go out with one of my 9 mm I have at least five or six full size Glock magazine 17 round and one in the gun I'm not going to be that guy that runs out of bullets and gets killed the one time that he has to defend himself or his loved ones or someone innocent anyway rant over ATF sucks I need to worry about getting the illegal guns off the street and doing more raids and worry about that I very seriously doubt and experience shooter I mean I really experienced shooter with the AR pistol abras isn't really going to make any difference with a front grip and he can operate the hell out of it I've actually seen people make 3D printed neon orange ones for their guns so if they get in trouble or get yanked up they say it's for a Nerf gun when they yank it off anyway ran over I'm done ATF pisses me off great videos by the way

That's awesome how they can decide how law abiding citizens can and can't buy their second amendment right and focus all their efforts and funding on taking away from the good people instead of finding the criminals do you think the criminals are going to not use AR braces or even send the automatic AR guns at all? I've seen videos of idiots posting stuff on here with fully automatic Glocks with drums and they couldn't be no older than 1617 and I know they weren't bonfiring or using a binary because it was screen recorded then I slowed it down and watch the video where the dude pulled the trigger back and held it back in the backwards position while the drum emptied and the gun went everywhere but on target

Making sbr's and suppressors legal isnt gunna increase crime ….we all know this….its just control of the people ….criminals will do whatever…. and gun violence is still lower than knifes 🔪….so are we gunna ban kitchen knifes

Do you have to be a member of those organization GOA, etc. prior to the ban or is it still cover people joining afterwards? Thanks! Love the update

Well, according to his comment, if a suppressor is not a firearm then it shouldn’t fall under the ATF’s control.

Time for Patriots to use the part of the constitution that removes traitors to America 🇺🇸 2A

Americans shouldn’t have to pay ATF’s $200 fee nor be threatened with imprisonment for making their pistol more stable and therefore more SAFE to shoot by using a stabilizing brace. A more stable gun is a more SAFE gun.

Ugh.. okay problem with this channel? Especially in these cases is he just summarize the entire court notes. Can we put our pistol braces back on or no?

A 9 min video to tell us what ?

So can you own pistol braces legally yet? Lol

Not a bearable arm? The old lock, stock and barrel meme is dead! Only the "lock" (the receiver) is controlled as a firearm–the rest are accessories and parts. Ban all barrels? Barrels are parts and not "bearable arms." Ban stocks! Stocks are accessories and "not bearable arms." All that is allowed is a registered receiver with no parts or accessories to a licensed owner–naw, not an infringement. What a wonderful legal argument. Magazines are parts, accessories, or both–it isn't infringing to ban a part or accessory that is integral to the functioning of a bearable arm? That's unbearable!

Are those judges on the right pills?

Arguing "you have no standing until you have become a convicted felon, and then you have no rights because felons are no longer full citizens" is "shaddup! Shaddup!! SHUT UP!!!"

So the supreme Court ruled that Bruen use history and text for the second amendment. It will be interesting to see how they justify the 1934 NFA. My guess is they will rely on lower courts to uphold the NFA and then not take up trh case when it reaches them. Everyone thinks the court is non political pro gun. I would disagree. Recent revelations about Thomas and the millions he took in bribes has shown they are most certainly right wing and pro getting votes for Republicans. But they are not pro gun list like most of the Republican leadership. The right politicians never do anything nor try to push anything that is pro 2A. They have your vote already and they certainly don't want their base to have more weapons. After Bruen, it should have been a slam dunk case to take down the NFA. It's still here and doesn't seem to be going anywhere anytime fast.

If they follow the Bruen decision, there were no laws against owning either of them during the time of the founding. They are not dangerous and unusual. Also throw in automatic machine guns. There were no laws against it and of course they are not dangerous and unusual. The whole of the 1934 NFA should be struck down as being unconstitutional.

I'm surprised by the ND decision. ND has 3 guns per person

If accessories aren’t arms then why are they trying to regulate them

2nd A community so toxic lol. High capacity clip ban is BS. 😂

Great content, ya atf doing too much. I agree on restrictions on fully automatic weapons

The problem is uneducated stuck on stupid power hungry numb nuts want to make rules. Its that simple. If the FBI would do their job we wouldnt have the ATF.

Judge in North Dakota is a moron

This has gone to far 😔

im from north dakota, cant believe it

When the SC is ruled by Leftists, the 2A will be ruined.

Their whole Ruling and bases of argument is bullshit, it's ALL just word play to push restrictions and legislation that they want.

Firearms fall under the Second Amendment, accessories are not firearms and should NOT have any restrictions or regulations. They treat suppressors as "firearms," to regulate them. Which is already dumb, but whereas they are trying to use the argument that accessories are not firearms. An are therefore not protected under the Second Amendment. When first off there should NOT be any legislation regulating or restricting firearms, nor the Second Amendment.

But accessories do not change a firearm. Sights, optics, lasers, grips, butt stocks. Do not change or enhance firearms, they're used to customize fit and efficiency. If anything to make a shooter more accurate, it doesn't make anything more dangerous. That's like if the Federal Governnent were to try an say that "firearms" are protected under the Second Amendment, but that "ammunition" is not a firearm. An therefore is not protected by the Second Amendment, so if they wanted to they can restrict, limit or ban the sale of ammunition.

When realistically any and everything pertaining to a firearms, ought to be protected by the Second Amendment.

ATF, as corrupt as the Biden administration

Looking at firearm accessories is a slippery slope. When are they going to include scope and red dots