Home AR-15 UPDATE! ATF Pistol Brace Rule! Are You Allowed to Keep Your Brace?

UPDATE! ATF Pistol Brace Rule! Are You Allowed to Keep Your Brace?

1338
34

Update on the ATF Pistol Brace Rule

Use code “tacticaladvisor” to save at the
companies below.

– Brownells – Use code “TA10”
– Midwest Industries – Use code “TA10”
– ZEV – 10% off
– Vertx – 15% off
– Cloud Defensive – 10% off
– Infinity Targets – 10% off – “ADVISOR10”
– TA Target’s – 10% off
– Neomag – 10% off
– Lox Hair product – 10% off
– Premier Body Armor – 10% off
– Kunvirt – 10% off
– USElite Gear – Free Shipping
– Slate Black – Use code “tacadv”
– RMA Armor – Use code “TA10” for 10% off
– Drew Meyer Design – code “TA10” for 10% off

Items in video –
– Wireless Mic –
– Lighting –

Help Support My Channel (Linktree)

Howitzer Clothing

Patreon –

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

34 COMMENTS

  5. Awesome thanks for the update. Where is the NRA? Probably taking someone’s $ and not sending them the magazine promised or pheasant hunting with Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham or Liz Cheney ( better be careful there). No matter your opinion of pistol braces the silence from the NRA should be deafening. We pay “law makers” then we pay the NRA to protect us from the law makers? I guess you could call it a peaceful shakedown by law makers and the NRA.

  6. I'm not waiting for the decision I already made up my mind on what I can and can not do if you're willing to comply with this you are kind of a coward and the reason we are going to lose all of this

  19. Firstly, I really appreciate that you didn't make the umpteenth video that vomits the 5 ways/things you can do to "comply"… As for the GOA/FPC & others coverage for their injunction-all that business etc; I wouldn't have spoken on it. Neither (Dot)Orgs- Can or will come out & openly say that YES you're covered if XYZ. They wont clarify if it's just within the 5th, they wont define. Even the Umbrella date of coverage was very wonky. It's "assumed" that if you were a member** I believe(It was before the judge issued his ruling initially) or if you became a member before then, they said members were covered. Everyone from Guntubers/Lawtubers/Indpt News were covering this & blasting it everywhere. All these organizations or I should say 3 main, got huge influx of membership(s) before this ruling just so people could be covered in many different ways/areas in case there were any failures. It's not a bad to donate/become a member with any of these guys. However, if they misled everyone by saying everyones covered & they weren't just to get the money then that IS a problem……in my eyes atleest.. As o stated they will not clarify coverage. I asked this via email & 3MO later they dodge the question and referred me to a link which was court documents on the case aka "The Ruling & So called Scope of it".

    ATF changes their minds faster than our world spins and lacks consistency. Anyone questioning should just look at the case and the ruling.

  20. Not for Alabama, SB2 was passed last year, which is the 2nd amendment protection act which nobody is talking about
    1.26

    Section 1. (a) This section shall be known and may

    1.27

    be cited as the Alabama Second Amendment Protection Act.

    2.1

    (b) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the

    2.2

    contrary, an official, officer, employee, or agent of the

    2.3

    state or political subdivision thereof, when acting in an

    2.4

    official capacity, may not enforce or administer any executive

    2.5

    order issued by the President of the United States which

    2.6

    limits or restricts the ownership, use, or possession of

    2.7

    firearms, ammunition, or firearm accessories by law-abiding

    2.8

    residents of the state. An official, officer, employee, or

    2.9

    agent of the state or political subdivision thereof, when

    2.10

    acting in an official capacity, shall not be ordered,

    2.11

    directed, or compelled to execute or administer the executive

    2.12

    order.

    2.13

    (c) No state or local public funds may be expended

    2.14

    for the enforcement of any executive order issued by the

    2.15

    President of the United States which limits or restricts the

    2.16

    ownership, use, or possession of firearms, ammunition, or

    2.17

    firearm accessories by law-abiding residents of the state, as

    2.18

    described in subsection (b).

    2.19

    (d) The Attorney General may issue guidance to state

    2.20

    and local officials to ensure uniform compliance with this

    2.21

    section.

  23. Joining organizations may cover you under "ex pos facto" legal precedent. But still not sure. Regardless, if you owned braces PRIOR to this B.S. ATF rule, legally it 100% should cover you, whether you're in an organization or not.

  26. I hear a lot of "This is wrong", "Frustrated", "they shouldn't be able to..", "It violates the constitution.." Well, it seems that they don't care what you think. What are you willing to do about it?

  32. Non-Compliance; Resistance; Defiance! NOW is the time to purchase spare BCG, Spare Uppers and Lowers for AR Variants, Magazines and ammo, and cache in numerous un-disclosed, remote, secure re-supply points for the future years to come. & Spread the Word – This is called: "Dispersal of Assets". It is as American as Mom's Apple Pie!

Leave a Reply