Home AR-15 How the AR-15 went from military weapon to civilian gun

How the AR-15 went from military weapon to civilian gun

1606
42

The weapons used in the San Bernardino shooting were versions of a popular rifle called the AR-15 rifle. That same gun has been used in many infamous mass shootings. Dean Reynolds reports.

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

42 COMMENTS

  1. The AR15 was made by Armalite and have never been used in a war. The military guns, The M16 rifle and eventually M4 carbine, are made by Colt. The M16/M4 are AR15 pattern rifles, but are illegal to own and have never been sold to civilians who don’t have specific NFA permits.

  2. Assault is a action not a rifle. You can just as easily use any rifle, pistol or a knife! In fact there more people killed by knifes than rifles. Quit with the bs narrative!

  3. 2:05 She says all bugged eyed, from what! Uh maybe 50 rioters trying to storm through your business that you also live in! They are defunding police, it will spread from state to state! We really need these guns now!!

  4. wow any ban on semi automatic weapons is a violation of the 2nd amendment it's unconstitutional I can't believe that Illinois actually band it especially when handguns are used more in shootings

  5. It was never a military rifle…I don’t own one but this is just plain false. The manufacturer Colt brought the weapon in, in 1963 for civilian usage. It’s never seen a battlefield, nor is it suited for usage on a battlefield

  6. Military and cops have guns as well so now should we want to ban what cops and military use? Come on losers. Why does a President or mayor ir even a football player need to be paid so much? They dont need millions right? Lmao why do women need fake hair or nails. The last time I looked killing a person was illegal against the law but people still do it.

  7. The army got it from the civilian market, Eugene stoners armalite rifle. After years of testing and some conspiracy from the army, using national match m1a's against rack grade ar15s, and a lot of pull from the air force under Curtis Lemay. After aquisition the military made some changes, added automatic fire capability and later moved the charging handle from the top to the back.

  8. CBS, what is seemingly supposed to be an objective news network, can't even get the simple facts surrounding firearms correct. Really boosts your confidence in news networks…..doesn't it? LOL
    CBS FAIL HARD

  9. "To protect themselves."
    "From what?"

    Ummm…how about criminals with guns? Isn't the reason this idiot mayor wants to ban AR-15's is because she feels they contribute to so much violence? But as soon as someone says they need to own one in order to protect themselves…she's now going to act like there is no gun violence, hence no reason to own an AR for self protection. These gun grabbers self defeat their own arguments.

  10. So many blatant errors or lies. The Oregon shooting did not use an AR15. He slaughtered his victims with a hand gun. No it doesn't make a difference in the result of the victims but politicizing the loss of life for the convenience of an article is wrong. Also the semiauto AR15 is neither a weapon of war or used by the military. The Original full auto Armalite AR15 and the semi auto Colt AR15 are not the same. One cost $600-900 the other $16,000. The military uses both the M16 and the M4. Both are versions of the full auto original Armalite AR15 and not the civilian Colt AR15.

  11. "Why does anyone need an assault weapon in their day to day lives?"
    "To protect themselves."
    "From what?"
    How about we take a field trip to Chicago, Ms. Mayor.

  12. Odd that 80% of mass shootings don't use the AR15 folks. FBI statistics shown that less than 1% of the AR-15 rifles were ever used in violent crime folks. Most of theses so called News Media outlets are now anti-gun and 2nd Amendment. They will give many false info about the AR15 and M16 rifles and sadly they know they are giving half truths and lies folks. Their agenda is get the government to restrict or ban most or all firearms to law abiding citizens.

  13. Anyone who is against me or my fellow country man's freedom to bear arms is a traitor to this country, none of you would be here if it weren't for firearms,maybe you all should brush up on your history,time to embrace your heritage.

  14. SO far AR15 is a preferred choice to shoot fellow American and children. So much for self defense. ANy way you slice the lie., AR15 is a weapon of war and our children caught between that war. So what is your next excuses to own this war machine AR15?

  15. He's got it wrong. The guns our military use are a fully automatic version of the AR-15. They were modeled AFTER it. The AR-15 was NOT designed as a version of ANYTHING

  16. obviously a balanced essay upset someone to wish to drop the comment from last week, or maybe not but here it is again:

    I don't see how this particular shooting supports rhetoric/argument on EITHER side of current the gun control debate. As a person going into my office on the day of the office Christmas party, I doubt if I would be carrying a firearm, nor do I assume the boss maintains a weapons locker in the office supplies room; SO if I was there that day, I would not likely be able to defend with a firearm myself despite free exercise or tight gun legislation. I doubt if a terrorist couple would wait for me to go get my gun, just to play fair.

    Conversely, it doesn't support strong gun legislation either. No proposed legislation if enacted would have stopped a bit of last week's events. The shooters "borrowed" their illegally modified, large clip AR15s from a neighbor and the husband was able to pass all the background checks in a tighter gun control state like CALIFORNIA, and of course they crafted bombs. The shooters in Paris for the last 3 attacks were able to get guns or automatic real military assault weapons illegally, apparently in Belgium, despite two of the recent terrorists only recently "refugeeing" into Europe in the summer with false papers. Picked up military weapons in a tightly gun restricted nation and drove across an open border to another gun restricted nation all without catching the eye of a single government "professional" there to keep that from happening. The same thing happened recently in newly gun restricted Australia and then there was the occurrence in Canada, inside the government building.

    I'd rather not live in a world where everyone is packing heat in their everyday lives, but I also like to see people decide issues based on realistic logic and not just use and spin any tragic incident to win an argument. Life is not a ball game, with winners and losers. We guess wrong, we ALL lose.

  17. The second amendment is to protect us from a tyrannical government, We must have equal or greater defense for our protection, GUN FREE ZONES ARE CRIME SPREE ZONES. Giving up your right to protect yourself is a mental illness,

Leave a Reply