Norinco Mac 90 & Rock River Arms Lar-15 vs a Sand filed cinderblock wall….
Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.
in the philippines when cinder blocks are used they are reinforced with steel rods and the whole inside is filled with cement …even when used only as fence
Perfect example of someone who don't know what they speak of, .233/5.56 is very lethal round, shit they're x-rays of wounds where the 5.56 hit a guy in the leg and the bullet stopped and shattered his femur, and another pic of a wound (x-ray of someone's shoulder which is shattered from the round. Google it
THats BS, sure the AR is plenty accurate but I have no problem hitting a stationary man sized target at 500 yards with my AK. Not to mention .223 is significantly less lethal than the 7.62×39 considering it's smaller and NATO
If the norm was being a lefty than this ak47 design would be almost perfect, except for the 2 steps it takes to put a magazine in, and being less accurate. I am considering the 7.62 or .308in an ar-15 platform. My beef is with the ak47 design. The 5.56 rd if it does what its supposed to, tumble or fragment will cause more damage than a 7.62 rd. If it doesnt tumble than the 7.62 will do more damage since its a larger rd. Regardless i wouldnt want to be hit by either.
i dont think i would want to be in a shtf scenario using an ak47. especially in a fire fight, timing is everything, basic steps like putting a magazine in or having the charging handle on the right side, seems to me a poor design in the ak47, which takes longer to achieve compared to an ar-15. I would choose the ar-15 just because of these 2 faulty designs in the ak47.
LOL WHAT! Your go-to-weapon for 200-250yd distances is an AK?? What kinda groups are you getting there, 10-12 MOA? Yeah, that AK needs to be able to fire more than 5000 rounds without lube because thats how many rounds it will take for you to hit anything at 250 yds with an AK.
I'll take my Colt which needs lube after 2000+ rounds but can get 1 1/2" groupings at 300yds.
Anyone who wants and AR that WILL MALFUNCTION and will need REPLACEMENT PARTS and that needs to be LUBED EVERY 1000 rounds in a shtf situation more power to ya but id rather have an AK as my 200-250 yrd battle rifle. While your lubing your AR ill be on my 5000 th round with no maintenance at all.. AK hands down.
LOL, Like most of the ak owners are going to use it to kill people, i know some may use it for when something bad happens. And there have been alot of U.s military persons using the ak in fact Izmash the creator of ak currently makes ak riffles for the russian militarily put a video of u.s soldiers and how they like the a.k better than their m4s and m16s, alot of them complained about how small the .223 was and didn't have enough stopping power.
The AR platform is only superior in a very few ways… there's no AR in the world that will take the dirt, torture, and abuse that an AK will take, and still run with no problems. Ask any soldier that's spent any RECENT time in the sandbox, and they'll tell you the same thing.
Not really, the AK 7.62x39mm is actually small. The round is a rifle round but the cartridge is very small. Compare the Soviet 7.62x39mm with the NATO 7.62x51mm. There is a massive difference in size. The AK cartridge is similar in size to the AR 5.56 cartridge. You have a small amount of force pushing a large object. That's why Russia no longer uses the 7.62x39mm round. It's the reason they created a new round for the AK-74 that is similar to the 5.56 NATO round.
Where did he say it was a test?! He does exactly what the title tells: Use these two rifles to shoot the shit out of a cinderblock wall. Never did he say that he is comparing the two or that one is better than the other
i would like to point out he got the round the russians switched to wrong lol they changed to the 5.45 witch is better on soft targets and the 7.62 is a hole punch. so in my opion the 7.62 x39 has it's own job of punching holes in cover, and the 5.56 and the 5.45 are the 2 rounds that should be compaired
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy
Privacy Overview
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are as essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Why did you shoot the AK right handed and the pistol left handed? Also it would help if you aimed… because that was not aiming.
jesus – learn how to shoot fatso!
in the philippines when cinder blocks are used they are reinforced with steel rods and the whole inside is filled with cement …even when used only as fence
my grandma can reload better than you
Police officers use 223/556 do they use the 7.62×39 and 7.62×51
Wall sucks
would have helped if you shot at 2 different walls so we could compare the results…
Thank you or the video!!!!! GOD bless and keep you and JESUS loves you
now try this with an actual finished wall.
This is a bullshit test without building a new wall.. This video means NOTHING at all.. FAIL!
Nice vid but damn, work on your freaking reloads!
5.56×45 NATO is a soft Pb core with copper hard jacket compare to 7.62×39 M43 is a mid-hard steel core and hardened cooper jacket
Perfect example of someone who don't know what they speak of, .233/5.56 is very lethal round, shit they're x-rays of wounds where the 5.56 hit a guy in the leg and the bullet stopped and shattered his femur, and another pic of a wound (x-ray of someone's shoulder which is shattered from the round. Google it
@SerbSoldier1, yeah yeah 5.56 is only good for taking small children? I guess if the Enemy is considered small children it works pretty damn good
Man that ar reload time is amazing
THats BS, sure the AR is plenty accurate but I have no problem hitting a stationary man sized target at 500 yards with my AK. Not to mention .223 is significantly less lethal than the 7.62×39 considering it's smaller and NATO
AK: spray to stun enemy
AR: shot and spray for it not malfunction
bulkiness? Try wielding an M60! SMG/ARs and Battle rifles weight very lightly, 5 kilos at best!
AK 47,,ONE OF THE BEST WEAPON EVER MADE,,,YOU DUMB ASS !!!
how about you aim a little bit
The author has a sore head! To see force of AK-47 the monolithic concrete wall is necessary!
AR-15 FOR GIRLS AND AN AK-47 FOR TOUGH GUYS!!!!!!!!!!
ak is a peice of shit
ak=spray and pray
ar=one shot one kill
If the norm was being a lefty than this ak47 design would be almost perfect, except for the 2 steps it takes to put a magazine in, and being less accurate. I am considering the 7.62 or .308in an ar-15 platform. My beef is with the ak47 design. The 5.56 rd if it does what its supposed to, tumble or fragment will cause more damage than a 7.62 rd. If it doesnt tumble than the 7.62 will do more damage since its a larger rd. Regardless i wouldnt want to be hit by either.
im a lefty my ak fits fine and in a firefight my 7.62 puts you down first shot your 223 maybe but unlikely unless it tumbles
i dont think i would want to be in a shtf scenario using an ak47. especially in a fire fight, timing is everything, basic steps like putting a magazine in or having the charging handle on the right side, seems to me a poor design in the ak47, which takes longer to achieve compared to an ar-15. I would choose the ar-15 just because of these 2 faulty designs in the ak47.
CAN'T OWN AR'S IN MY COUNTRY.
Not that i'd need one tho.
LOL WHAT! Your go-to-weapon for 200-250yd distances is an AK?? What kinda groups are you getting there, 10-12 MOA? Yeah, that AK needs to be able to fire more than 5000 rounds without lube because thats how many rounds it will take for you to hit anything at 250 yds with an AK.
I'll take my Colt which needs lube after 2000+ rounds but can get 1 1/2" groupings at 300yds.
Anyone who wants and AR that WILL MALFUNCTION and will need REPLACEMENT PARTS and that needs to be LUBED EVERY 1000 rounds in a shtf situation more power to ya but id rather have an AK as my 200-250 yrd battle rifle. While your lubing your AR ill be on my 5000 th round with no maintenance at all.. AK hands down.
Bad comparison, bad shooting, a pistol?, and plays dress up. Boo
Izmash also makes ak's for the civilian market.
i like the ar15, and i like the ak47. i own an ar15 and i'm buying an ak47 this week. they are both awesome
But a sand filled cinderblock wall dosen't shoot back…
LOL, Like most of the ak owners are going to use it to kill people, i know some may use it for when something bad happens. And there have been alot of U.s military persons using the ak in fact Izmash the creator of ak currently makes ak riffles for the russian militarily put a video of u.s soldiers and how they like the a.k better than their m4s and m16s, alot of them complained about how small the .223 was and didn't have enough stopping power.
читается так-tundos
The AR platform is only superior in a very few ways… there's no AR in the world that will take the dirt, torture, and abuse that an AK will take, and still run with no problems. Ask any soldier that's spent any RECENT time in the sandbox, and they'll tell you the same thing.
AK is the BEST…..
someone isn't that good with 5,56 follow up shots huh!
lol
useless test, but I bet it was fun.
No real versus there. Looks more like on the same team with a sidearm to me.
Not really, the AK 7.62x39mm is actually small. The round is a rifle round but the cartridge is very small. Compare the Soviet 7.62x39mm with the NATO 7.62x51mm. There is a massive difference in size. The AK cartridge is similar in size to the AR 5.56 cartridge. You have a small amount of force pushing a large object. That's why Russia no longer uses the 7.62x39mm round. It's the reason they created a new round for the AK-74 that is similar to the 5.56 NATO round.
filthie commie
>clip
it's called a magazine, not a clip.
AK is better
Where did he say it was a test?! He does exactly what the title tells: Use these two rifles to shoot the shit out of a cinderblock wall. Never did he say that he is comparing the two or that one is better than the other
Ar was doing more dmg to the target than the ak. This is ar/ak vs wall. Not ar/ak vs wall and dirt behind wall
i would like to point out he got the round the russians switched to wrong lol they changed to the 5.45 witch is better on soft targets and the 7.62 is a hole punch. so in my opion the 7.62 x39 has it's own job of punching holes in cover, and the 5.56 and the 5.45 are the 2 rounds that should be compaired
No hard feelings… common knowledge that 7.62 wins