Home EOTech Parallax Comparison 2 : Eotech, HoloSun 510C-I, Sightmark, Bushnell

Parallax Comparison 2 : Eotech, HoloSun 510C-I, Sightmark, Bushnell

2746
21

Parallax Correction Level

[AAA]
Eotech 512 A.65
Holosun 510C
Sightmark Pro-Spec

[B]
Sightmark Ultra-Shot
Bushnell TRS25

Note to readers: Please click the share buttons above or below. Forward this article to your email lists. Crosspost on your blog site, social media, internet forums. etc.

21 COMMENTS

  1. I had a Sightmark 14000 that had a 2hr (srs) battery life using 3 AG5 cells. Good luck finding those anywhere but online. It also had a window bluer than stained glass and some the worst parallax shift I’ve ever seen. If their higher priced units work even moderately well there’s no reason for their budget crap to exist.

  2. Thank you so much for this video!! I only have the Bushnell out of this group but have been looking at both the Eotech and the 510c this month as my optic for my new pistol build. The Bushnell I have looks just like this video, which sucks. Gonna have to throw that in the trash and replace the optic on my other AR

  3. Awesome review, sir. Looks like Holosun came up on top, with Eotech close behind. Hate that cheapo Sightmark/Bushnell tint. And holy gerbil, them tube RDS' do have very pronounced POI shifts compared to single plane reflex sights. I may have to do my own investigation on that a bit.

  4. settings > 0.25 speed makes this video more valuable
    TRS25 pretty poor
    Sighmark dual-shot Pro looks deent but I would bet there is a huge variation from batch to batch or due to continious cost reductions

Leave a Reply